knopflerbruce

I think the name for it is just a name... maybe there was a reason behind it, but I know alot of people who use the phrase "junk food", but wouldnt think of the burgers etc as "junk". It's still amazing how this type of food often have a better taste than what's regarded as "proper food". Taste matters to me, not the price tag or if a chef with a mustache and a heavy salary made it and put it on a fancy plate;)

Hot wings make me fly:p A friend of mine puked from a bad burger at Burger King once, he told me. In general I would say that if the majority of the customers get ill after eating their food, they have a problem. So these kind of happenings are just exceptions to the rule - normally the food is well prepared;)

Double cheese is the best burgerr ever made... The McD one:D BK is nice, too - but it doesnt taste McD of their burgers:( I wish we had KFC here, I tried it in Berlin once and it was awesome.

Damn I'll celebrate at McDonalds the day it's gone... I'm SO tired of those **** submissions that end up in the wrong categories... have a 4000+ sd score that always ends up in the 4000+ clawhammer category, stealing a cup. Same with an i7 920 score that goes to Opteron 866 - and two more I cant remember. I dont even bother moving them, too much work. I just block:p What's weird is that no team captains have contacted me about these scores...

Me no understando. What's il problemo? j/k

I'll move the scores tomorrow. Sorry for the wait.

...so a 400 bclk result would be perfectly fine as well?

IMO this should be the only time you have a poll like this, unless you can't vote for your own team/nationality. It's obvious that these two things will count more than the effort when you decide where to put the vote.

3x to 4x-scaling hasn't been too great, so you can still compete at some level with only 3. But with 2 cards... no chance.

The fact that he's banned on other forums doesnt mean he should be banned here... I believe most folks get a second chance when BUGGED results are submitted. Photoshop - or stuff like that - is a different story.

Allright, I thought that was the "only" default solution:p I'll let some more experienced PCMark mods decide what's right or wrong here.

It says default settings, which is a fixed resolution (1024x768)

I guess some tests would give some "way off" numbers if he was running the wrong res.

Flash the BIOS, it's VERY easy on HD4890.

I've tried to get one for ages Only 2000 made...

Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. When the time is ready

I agree with alot of what you say, but at some point a statement must be made I think. Perhaps not now, but I believe alot of benchers will react at some point in the future if this type of sessions become more popular.

We shouldn't talk to a user who follows the rules, asking him to not enable points for a perfectly legal score is... wrong. This is not a loophole either, unless my definition of that word is wrong. I think of a loophole as an unintentional "workaround", which is not the case here as we are aware of the situation and can't do anything about it (apparently). I just hope the community itself will set a standard of what's acceptable and what's not

When people actually realize that this is allowed, they will definately pass these around, at least a little bit. The German scores were a result of that, which is fair enough - rules apply to everyone, and they didn't do anything wrong. Then, if this becomes the norm of every team, send the best CPU of the team to the guys with 4 HD4890's so they can take a record or two, will it still be OK? The problem is that "abuse" is hard to determine. Is it if it's shared between 3 or 4 members - or does it take like 15? Perhaps it's hard to create a rule without making moderating a PITA, but some guidelines about what's fair and what's not wouldn't be so bad If nothing is written down on the subject, any user will have one opinion about what's unfair and what's not.

Hahaha, that one nearly deserves to be sigged:D

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657942 I just noticed this one was blocked 2 years ago I wonder why, as the memory allocation is what it should be for pifast 4.1 - 61372k.

Will this new rank include points, or just a cup?

Non-suspicious scores won't (or at least shouldn't) get blocked if minor details are missing - like resolution and/or CPUZ memory tab. Basically, this just creates more work for the mods - and less time to moderate scores that have REAL issues.

I think I did a (clumsy) bug report about a year ago that was about this:p I have a feeling I didn't explain the issue very well back then. Good to see it's fixed now

I don't a TDP difference is enough to make a new category, so they should be merged.