Strunkenbold

Do you have an GPU-Z screenshot?

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/g31m_(ms-7379)/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x51l/ It was even already in the db just not visible. ^^

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/09ac_(ms-7050)/

1ms faster Why not submit this?

Why did the japanese had all these turbopll then? Cant imagine they binned 10 boards back in 2001 to get their 260Mhz fsb.

fixed

done

done

Whats wrong about this one: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/alivesata2_glan/

Ahh that explains quite a bit. I thought it had been done via integration since I cant edit this score field. Someone has todo this manually then.

Wont be added. Enter in X3 440 and set unlocked to 4 cores.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/lg-95c/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_r9_nano/

Turricans strategy was adding anything which had something different on GPU-Z / CPU-Z screen and did not show up in db. This was the fastest solution and I guess because of the huge amount of hardware which needed to be added it was the right one. Unfortunately this created also some problems like categorys for never existed hardware like the famous Athlon MP 1700+. When Antinomy took over his strategy was creating a db as exact as possible. And this takes time. About that 64bit NV40: http://web.archive.org/web/20080208081509/http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en-us/vga/content.php?S_ID=40

Thx, this seems to be really a rare one. I just knew about Rage GL PCI. Will add later.

Theres no special magic behind this. FSB was always shown on Socket 7 boards but just in combination with K6-2 and up cpus. All others showed no FSB. But still right frequency. L2 cache is shown with K6-2 but disappeared with K6-3+ and vice versa. This is just another example how hard it is for Frank to support these old boards. But what me make start thinking is that totally wrong results are being validated. And as always the only thing todo is report bugs to Frank or in the CPU-Z Bugs thread.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/txp4-x/

Announcement has been made: http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=141629 And yeah it seems this year its about the honor.

mat, Im sorry that I dont want to read through those lengthy thread so in case this has been already asked, Im sorry but is this: http://hwbot.org/submission/2822546_amd_radeon_gpupi___1b_radeon_r9_290x_20sec_680ms correct? Reduction time should be added on calculation time, but here it looks like reduction time is ignored.

Ok here some explanations: -8mb TNT cards, Chris Ney promised testing for performance differences but until now he didnt report back -AIW wont be added anymore. I will have to go through db and merge all already existing cards -6800 cards, I made a list with the cards needed to be added. Probably need to go through all subs and sort them according their specs. A lot time needed -same for rage cards, created a list with models I think that they have existed. Though I have no card with SGR mems would really like to know what GPU-Z is showing. I ordered as much different cards on ebay as I could find. I crawled through a lot of websites, still I cant reliable say that my list is complete and correct Oh and did you know? I dont get money for this. Im working as a volunteer on this but I cant even list this as a reference cause nobody in industry cares. "What did you? Working as db moderator for hwbot? lol!" So its really up to me for what Im spending my time, though its clear adding a motherboard takes 2 minutes. For those rage and 6800 changes its hours.

1,3,5 and 6 fixed. We probably need to ask Antinomy about 4

There is simply a plot against you! No serious, I need more time to make these changes. Its on my todo list. But there is much on my todo list.

Ah sorry, I thought it was affected by the same db bug we see for some results. Guess I learned something today. Though that fsb is incredible high for a sis...

hwbot db bug. This was some different mobo.