Strunkenbold

Already there http://hwbot.org/hardware/processors#key=sempron_2600_plus_thoroughbred Maybe was hard to find? Fixed name scheme from "Socket A" to Core name.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/pch-dl/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/a55bm-e/

Corrected, thx!

fixed one for you: http://hwbot.org/submission/2953416_ You can edit the rest yourself, hit edit button and select 2x 4790k, save. Than edit again and select 1x 4790k, save.

its already here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_6800_gs_nv40_agp/ You can see, adding just more and more without research ends in a db which is bloated with incorrect entry's. Already today its too hard for the user to decide which is the right category for his card. We are working on this but its very hard. Until now, I found alone 17 variants of 6800 AGP.

So to achieve this you basically have to trick your pll thinking it has to change its FSB outputs to ISA outputs, as there are no other components in the system which the pll delivers with such a low bus clock. But that has to happen internal as the connection between CPU and PLL doesnt change. While I dont know if the pll can internal reroute its clock signals, it would be interesting to know if changing jumpers to your found undocumented setting also set your bus to 7Mhz with original bios! If so you really found something cool! If not, its more likely that the other Bios transformed your system to a complete mess. Means all sources where CPU-Z detects your clock frequency are now basically upside down. I experienced something similar when changing default clock generator (14,318Mhz) to something faster. I checked bus frequency with a DMM and its improved correctly but CPU-Z didnt show the same results as my DMM. So why? Its actually easy. I forgot that system time also relies on that 14,318Mhz. So time got "improved" as well and was running freaky fast.

Very nice, thx! Now its the question where you actually can get such a card as I cant see it available in Europe.

This is exactly the problem. Old cards need to be decided individually. Thx for the example.

added http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/permedia_2v/ About those TNT versions, our general guide line is not adding cards based on memory size anymore. There are lots of categorys which should not be there anymore because of this. But things take time, tools to do this comfortably are not working at the moment. The only exception would be if it has some huge performance impact. The rest is still being discussed.

The cooling is in general very bad of these CPUs. Massive heat got the caps bulging of basically all Slot A boards and thats why u almost get no board anymore.

We are about to get everything done. There are just the Cyrix 486 Cpus missing. Massman still needs to update the restrictions to allow Cyrix, Intel and UMC ones.

Everything fixed +added some more boards which were already in our db but didnt appeared yet.

added: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/8ttx+/

Just joking man. Though I wonder why skylake gains so much points in XTU. Its more efficient clock per clock but other benchs doesnt show that big advantage maybe 300-400Mhz advantage over Haswell but XTU? 6Ghz Haswell results get beaten by 5Ghz Skylake easily. Is DDR4 really so much faster?

XTU bugged for sure!!

Thx Mr. Paco Im sorry if I maybe sound a little rude.

You mean gaming? If its worth for you spending 600***8364; for proper RAM/CPU/Mobo combination and gaining 1-5fps in games than yes. Oh and you save some watts ofcourse for the environment. It is an interesting platform for sure but if I would still own a good sandybridge I wouldnt upgrade.

Well this is because _Im_ a very confused person. I never said they cheated, I just made them aware of a bug. Its disappointing that they didnt start to investigate what could be wrong. Now we see that those 50Mhz submissions got deleted because _they were_ faulty. This bug has been confirmed and already debugged. I posted in every of my "complains" the link to the bug thread. So to make it even more clear and because I still think that you actually have no clue what we talk about: 1. On motherboard or in the manual there are all possible multiplier settings listed. Except there is no 1.0 multi, so you set the lowest which is 1.5. 2. motherboard starts up showing 75Mhz in post(1.5x50Mhz) 3. CPU-Z starts up saying 1.0x50Mhz, strange... So you dont get curious? You dont check tools like WCPUID or CPUCool? Ok at this point, we still can say those things can happen but after people commented under your score stating that there is probably a bug you still dont react? I really hoped that new CPU-Z is out now because of Windows 10 and Skylake but it seems something hold it back.

Well I just want to say that its very hard to achieve 330Mhz+ on Air with that CPU. It is possible that you just encountered buggy CPU-Z. Maybe you could double check that with WCPUID or CPU-Z with DMI=0 in cpuz.ini.

Any comment from you Mac? Isnt that a + model? If its a non plus, could you please post it in the CPU-Z bug thread?

didnt saw any clock generator doing 150Mhz. But maybe with TurboPLL?

It would be actually cool to have a wprime ranking for the old sockets aswell, especially for those who cant run Cinebench

I have such a cyrix to test but I wont boot with my board. Will have to try out a 5AX sometime... Anyway, even if I can get this to run I probably cant reproduce this. There are possible wpcredit tweaks applied dunno if thats enough to boost this score from 20min+ to 3mins.

Giving the fact that these rams should run 1:1 to bus speed, why do CPU-Z show 0,1 Mhz more RAM speed than Bus speed? Does anyone know?