GENiEBEN

CN decides, but I think it should be more "generic".

37 LOAD? Fridge oc?

467 so far here, 0.1 average

I'm more surprised the wrapper didn't belly up after so long <3

Didn't get a chance to sit @ laptop in 2 days, sorry.

Might as well close it now.

The card does not support the normal settings that the wrapper uses, hence the 'error', it's ok as I can look over the settings used and compare with others. EDIT: [2015-08-03T10:14:28] could not find details file So that's why it's 0.

Lol, dude, that is what the motherboard itself is reporting, there's no detection issue, and if you looked carefully that is what CPU-Z reports as well...because that's what DMI is reporting. If the board was sold by both Jetway and ASRock, under same or different name, take it up with them and their laziness.

Done.

YES

Haha this is awesome, let's see if I can break 30 hours mark.

I know ASUS used to ship with both faceplates if the packaging was retail.

FID 0 DID 4 Never measured, thing is that it certainly is under the normal minimum (800mhz), everything is extra slow and laggy. There's only so much that cpu'z can do http://valid.canardpc.com/nxudfp I can try with a QL-62 as well, but it should be the same output.

Wish that was possible lol....now I need fsb 100 or lower. @Ludek... K10STAT, most cpus ignore the settings in the app, but this one is ok with it.

Must go deeper.

DOne

Done.

I don't see the point of it either...

I say we should also split them by socket generation (g1-g4).

Because that's where's supposed to be? Does the physical chip say otherwise?

inb4 people report it, W8 + fsb oc. I know it's AMD, but they weren't all silly RTC bug free.

Not really valid under current rules, PM me on FB to send you the validation tool Btw, since you bothered to manually start, run it with no GUI for couple extra points.

None taken Here's to future cups :celebration:

Shiiiiet, I might have to plug in the eGPU for this one.

Ha, that much only? 450 lost here