-
Posts
13450 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
711
Everything posted by Leeghoofd
-
So you think it is realistic that sometimes you get an insane score increase with lower (b)clocks. that is okay in your book ? Coz it is the way win 8 and co work in your book that makes it justified... Plz enlighten me how you can moderate such scores ? A score should be linked to a certain important factors so you can verify the validity, and seperate the photoshoppers from the clockers... Newer benchmarks evolve, the older ones just need a bulletproof OS to work on and that is depending benchmark WinXP, Vista and Win7 for the let us call it legacy stuff... It takes dedication to do all the 2/3D on your hardware... Believe me HWbot is not going down due to this RTC thingy
-
The issue is you can get very bugged results in the older benchmarks mate with Win8 or later... only CPU architecture seems to be Skylake which is not RTC bugged.
-
Strat - Core i7 6700K @ 6100MHz - 2074 marks XTU
Leeghoofd replied to rockeur.alexis's topic in Result Discussions
Awesome work, you have been busy lately -
Checking it bro.... thanks you did in an hour what Massman tried to do since the release date of Win 10
-
Splave.ROM - Core i7 6700K @ 6204MHz - 2081 marks XTU
Leeghoofd replied to 12's topic in Result Discussions
Jack rOxOrS -
Vivi - Core i7 6700K @ 6200MHz - 1339 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to steponz's topic in Result Discussions
Banned due to hardware cheat -
Bullshooter - Core i5 3570K @ 6261.6MHz - 6539.49 pps HWBOT Prime
Leeghoofd replied to a topic in Result Discussions
Way to go Frank! -
why sell it, beats mine any day
-
Can we update the rules asap for all these benchmarks, add Win10 to the no go list plz
-
Dancop - Core i7 5960X @ 6012.8MHz - 2414 cb Cinebench - R15
Leeghoofd replied to BenchBros's topic in Result Discussions
Awesome banana run! -
Nope limit was 5003Mhz Mhz and the nr of cores. No division by core this time....
-
I'm having scaling performance issues with my samsung (first on hand touch makes me feel these are the new Hynix MFR with DDR3), but need to contact Hiwa asap for a checkup...
-
Sorry for being negative here: Question: with the pot calculation PJ, so I can just mount a pot on top of the memory and mention LN2'ed memory, thus I will receive more points? Splave and XA have been running LN2ed memory since ages for 2D, for them its comon sense, for me it is too much hassle lol. Also the ones that have acess to multiple CPU platforms can be counted on two hands they get massive points coz they just have access ? I get your thinking process. Now I think what's bugging most 3D users is that all these XTU scores grab big points. Nevertheless it's always the same with new CPU technology it will slowly fade away and an 1800 XTU score with Skylake will become a comon thing. Another view on things, those that were the thread starters of this recalculation. Those are the ones that have them "Ownage CPUs" that can run Vantage at +5.6Ghz and beyond. Even a quick scatter bench CB/XTU will give them an easy top 5-10 score... gosh they don't like 2D, so all of the sudden you need to redo the entire point calculation? I don't like high end 3D cos its just a too high investment to even participate against some watercooling guys And to some of you 2D is not as easy as it seems, these hardcore guys go way deeper than we all did 5 years ago... there's more to it than raw frequencies nowadays... I like it as it is, if it changes no problem either, we will adapt again but beware of the new traps:) Last but not least I like point two of Alva
-
you are showing the profiles tab of XTU. We need to see the benchmark score and be able to verify the XTU reading of the speed of the CPU during the benchmark.
-
Strat - Core i7 6700K @ 5920MHz - 2016 marks XTU
Leeghoofd replied to dx4picco's topic in Result Discussions
Way to go !