Rave

Included in the OC Pack

Software has been released: https://www.elmorlabs.com/index.php/forum/topic/evc2-beta-software/#postid-36

My order placed on the 1st of July had valid tracking information through the 17TRACK link in the email (shipped via YODEL in the UK) and it has arrived today, just an hour ago.

Do they need maxmem like Sammy b-die?

Thermi triplets :O GG

was running the gpu at 1.4v

Fermi technically has DX12 "support", in the sense it's been grafted onto the damn thing, however, the regular time spy is already a slideshow. Obviously not going to be optimal with the comp anyway...

Issue seems to be fixed, cheers! ?

Hey there, are you able to rebench this chip and benchmark for this stage in team cup? http://hwbot.org/competition/team_cup_2018_ddr3/stage/4366_hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k__socket_2011_(not_2011-3) Currently we have a 4 core in there that needs to be bumped out by a better score, remember to use the correct background when you do submit. Cheers :)

Cheers unity! And yeah the drivers have come a long way jumper. Somewhere around mid-late 2017 they got massively better for pretty much all GCN arch cards.

Consider it as somewhat a super budget apex, you probably won't be breaking superpi records but it can be a nice legacy 3d benching platform. In my experience it can achieve get some fairly decent results, 4000c12 is achievable using the 3866 strap + 103.5bclk. Some ram straps are either completely broken, like the 3900 strap will not post at all, or won't post tight, like the 4000 strap will not post anything lower than c13 and the 4133 strap doesn't seem to want to work at anything lower than c18. The board is also missing control over RTL and IOL timings and also doesn't have vttddr voltage control if you have a b-die kit that's especially voltage picky. It can also take ages to post when pushing hard, so be patient.

It appears the benchmark rules pages are currently borked in that they do not show the rules and only the discussion thread. For example here's what the rules page for Aquamark3 currently looks like: And here's a screencap of a wayback machine snapshot from back in march this year:

Atleast on this cooling setup, I doubt it. This chip is super not happy to do much at all above 5.2

Who needs 7980XEs and 2990WXs when this powerhouse exists?!

Oh it can surpass that easily, 4133 17-18-18, 4000 13-12-12 and 3900 12-11-11 (3866 + 101bclk, 3900 strap is broken) are all possible.

I like to think of it as the poor man's apex. Does struggle a bit when pushing mem really hard but otherwise a solid board for the price, especially since it's on discount fairly often.

Strong sub!

Cheers for the heads up, link has been added. ?

Just encountered this issue on Z370, +1 to the chipset drivers causing the issue. Nuking everything Intel in device manager got it working so thankfully no reinstall needed.

Cheers unity :D

@Jumper118 That's definitely a thing on the C6H, slots 2 and 4 are much more stable due to the way the mem traces have been optimised, wouldn't be surprised if it's also carried over to the C7H. Inversely my giga x370 board is pretty indifferent about which slots are populated.

Those global team power points tho :P

https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/Z370-AORUS-ULTRA-GAMING-20-rev-10#kf http://valid.x86.fr/md02jv Cheers.

Great job! :D

Wow, 4000 tight?! Fantastic work!