TaPaKaH

Same answer for ORB backup - none.

browser: mozille 11, opera 9, ie5 (same bug on all) example profile: http://hwbot.org/user/massman/#My_Submissions if I select Motherboards then ReferenceClock (default) field is empty as if PJ had no submissions same for Videocards-3DMark01, Memory-Maxxmem and Processor-SuperPI but if you select Videocards-3DMark03 and then 3DMark01 - then submissions are shown

This is seriously quick, how the hell did you get such efficiency ?

glad to know that the CPU is doing well

But then you'd need to somehow insert a CPU model in there as well because some may complain that 5.9GHz 2600K =/= 5.9GHz i7-980X ... and if you do that, I think the table will become too wide and tabs won't fit properly.

lol, you've taken one of the hardest 2D records at your bootup clocks and hardly any tweaks got any backups?

very nice efficency, I have no idea how you have done it.

score is done with a 9800GT default 169.21 driver was pre-installed using another card and when the 9800GT was plugged in I went for the "Don't search, I'll choose the driver to install" option and forced 8800GT detection if you check the GPUID and the BIOS version - it's all there

while Mr.Fail fails to produce a score - I'll show one of my backups 3 stories

I have a special challenge for Christian Ney

where are the sauna pics ?

can someone fix these scores? not getting points for both, already tried to recalc http://hwbot.org/submission/2196528_ http://hwbot.org/submission/2196532_

wow!

GDDR5 on HD4850 ?

VERY nice card

Opera 9.50 while I'm at it - there's another issue (?) that's been there since first days of rev4 (never really paid attention to it) right sidebar with rankings isn't there but at the bottom of the page

starting from today, can't see any hardware category when navigate from the search tab this is what I get: http://h7.abload.de/img/lolsuqu.jpg

you think someone's rivalling your beloved madshrimps on the number of handed our awards (=badges =recommendations) ?

this present is as GEEKY as it gets

not all Denebs (especially the 3-letter C3 ones) scale well with volts above 1.8 as they do with temps so sometimes it's smarter to decrease voltage and get CPU temp down by a couple degrees rather than just shove 2.0V in

as long as you advertise ASUS, I don't think Andre will mind

it's CPU bottleneckedcompared to singlecard, SLi yields no more than 1k

it's only a matter of time before Hazzan wakes up (it's currently night in Asia) and beats you with a backup

I'm not really into PCM05 but I believe that it's been causing verification issues since the very first day of its competitive benching. Am I right by saying that there is no way even for the FM staff to tell whether the benchmark was manipulated in order to achieve those "too high subtest scores" ? If so, then it leaves only two options - "anything goes" and "remove". With first giving unlimited manipulation opportunities, I believe we may end up in the same situation as we did with 3DMark2000, so I had to vote for its removal. If there IS a way of telling - then I think we need to introduce a new set of rules and "save" PCM05 until we have something more decent to replace it with.

You got very lucky with that C0/C1 ES then. I had a few of those in the first days of 1366 - most couldn't even hit 200. On average, C1 retails were a tad better and D0 - even better than that.