Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
  • Posts

    3655
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    29

Everything posted by TaPaKaH

  1. so what's the criteria for a competition to count for "competition points" then ?
  2. Does it mean I can organise competition with a one-man qualifier, win it, get points, then make one-man "Worldwide Final", win it, get more points?As for others - sorry, my competition is invite only...
  3. Do not like: 1. Competition points for Xtreme Overclockers League. Not everyone has fair chances of entering a competition, no matter how good of an overclocker you are. (Examples: Latvia, USA, Russia,etc.) 2. No more possibility to update/delete scores. When I rebench something, I no longer want COLARDYN IT GCV to go bust on hosting my old scores which are now useless.
  4. general: my classmates ... was cool having more MHZ than them back in 1999-2000 extreme: THG videos on singlestage/LN2 in 2002-2003
  5. so you could only live w/o overclocking for less than 3 months ?
  6. first of all, that's 2:3 misreported as 3:5 and second - other ASUS models / 790i can do it too
  7. my 1600+ = http://www.abload.de/img/dsc047360fby.jpg = open my 1700+ = http://www.abload.de/img/dsc047378dmx.jpg = open my 1800+ = http://www.abload.de/img/dsc047387fl2.jpg = open makes them MP unless I cut it manually and rebench, right? funny that I bought all these Palominos from different ppl and all seem to be "not originals"
  8. Unless I find a way to fix my NF7 (which has set itself on fire this morning) I won't be able to make any further tests. I seem not to be the only one with this issue - Blutregen has a misreported 1600+ too (link) it's funny that on my 1700+ (example) submissions CPU-Z reads the "Athlon XP" CPU string and still thinks it's an MP
  9. I provide picture of the actual CPU with the CPU-Z submission usually - these are all genuine XP 1600+, 1700+, 1800+ and not MP. I guess they are misdetected by the CPU-Z, if you have an XP Palomino I think you can have a go yourself.
  10. latest CPUz sometimes bugs reading the FSB waay over it actually is on s462 ... I even got 500+ validated
  11. ehrr, it's not an X58 board on the pic what PCIe freq for 257 ?
  12. I tried a cedarmill with -16 ambient last monday got 6390MHz suicide
  13. GT240 has pretty much the same parameters as 9600 GSO, which has even more crippled G92 than 9800GT hence 9800GT is a better choice (GDDR5 doesn't make up for the difference)
  14. I think there will be very few participants in S775 category ... 1000MHz 32M capable X48 boards are hard to find, not even talking about 1050 with high FSB / tight PL + subs
  15. I don't bench 3D so I don't care ... but since lots of people are happy with paying money for benchmarking software, I will forward this info to Franck so that we can have $50 CPU-Z "advanced" licences with subfrequencies (bclk/qpi/uncore) visible
  16. http://h-2.abload.de/img/dsc04697kxoi.jpg Gallatin CPUs are allowed for S478 too, right?
  17. with the rev4 coming in a couple of months I don't see much point in this move
  18. nice going there Sven ...you made me start benching Socket A to keep away from you
  19. congrats on becoming one year younger, George
×
×
  • Create New...