I.nfraR.ed

I've sorted out mine as well, except there are 2-3 submissions that have the legit score inside, but need edit from a moderator. If you're going to make an exception for such kind of scores, I'd like to keep 'em. Otherwise, I can remove them too.

When half of your bed is occupied by hardware and when your gf comes you "temporary" move that hardware on top of the other hardware on the couch. Which, of course, was there just temporary

Ok, thanks. So I have 1-2 scores to remove then. Too bad we can't edit the scores ourselves. Oh, another question. What about scores linked to competitions? For example this one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2296871_i.nfrar.ed_ucbench_2011_core_2_e7500_%282.93ghz%29_310.4_mpt_score I don't care about it, but think it's a valid point in case some submissions have only bugged thread counts. Deleted my FX-9370 submission, #2 global 8-cores, but it had to go...

In fact every score (if the actual thread count is selected together with other "random" threads) contains the valid score too. For example, this score: http://hwbot.org/submission/2292481_i.nfrar.ed_ucbench_2011_athlon_64_4600_x2_windsor_186.9_mpt_score It's bugged, but #1 and #2 are ok and #2 is the valid score. What about this one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2260455_i.nfrar.ed_ucbench_2011_athlon_64_4200_x2_manchester_152.4_mpt_score Screenshot and images are lost, but the link shows that I've only used sse2 switch. Is it valid? It's not my fault the images are gone.

Nice! I have yet to try 3dmark2000 on this platform, but you're right - needs the right settings for best performance and difference between tweaked and untweaked system is significant in every benchmark with K6.

They sell only crap in this part of the world

Very nice! Will have to find a better cpu on water or go bruteforce and freeze my FX-57.

1/2" ID, 3/4" OD or 13/19mm, just the standard kind of tubing. I can get a normal tubing and insulate on the outside, but Norprene would be much better. FrozenCPU has it, but I want to avoid ordering from US. PS: Watercooling UK has it in Europe, but for the price per meter is not very attractive.

Btw, where can I find the Norprene tubing in Europe? I need 5-6m for a water chiller.

Yeah, I think this is max on air/water for me and stock volts on the VGA. It's 22C here, but still "colder" than 30C before

He really pushed it to the max. 0.99V is pretty insane! [ATTACH]2412[/ATTACH] Also going through bios options up and down like a pro, with settings on auto .

Why last few squares on the right column and the whole left column are black/not rendered? I think it's bugged, sorry. There's no magic tweak to compensate 400MHz difference in CPU frequency. Never seen this, curious that it gave you a score at all.

Noticed the same while browsing through some 3000+ submissions. My sub is not displayed in the rankings. In fact none of my 3000+ submissions are there. http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_3000_venice_s939/ [ATTACH]2395[/ATTACH] Also the search engine does not find anything when I search for SuperPi 1M/I.nfraR.ed/3000+ Venice s.939 for benchmark/user/cpu model respectively. Points in the category are not skewed/recalculated though. I still get the points, just the entry is missing in the table and slower results are shifted 1 place up. Athlon64 6000+ 1M is missing in the general K8 rankings too (and a lot of other entries from different users) when switching from 3000+ rankings to K8. It works when viewed from 6000+ rankings. [ATTACH]2398[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]2399[/ATTACH]

Wonderful! Was waiting for this result, but show us the maximum

Great one. As always . Keep up the good work.

I blame Massman for this Despite this is one of the cheapest new systems you can buy, it still requires a high-end nvidia card to be competitive in the competition. Wish it was the iGPU only... Anyway, good job!

Damn, I can't fight with you guys without 780(Ti)

Same happens for me if I use "capture.exe". Noticed that during MOA qualifiers.

Both seem fine, but are on the high side. For the same money you get this: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/310672415584?_trksid=p2059210.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

Here it is: 5V of a molex connector. Not easy to test something else at the moment, but they are good enough.

I think it was this one: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/201085740430 Problem for me was that many sellers don't send to Bulgaria, so I had to buy the cheapest that had shipping to my country. Let me check the accuracy...

No, throw these in the trash. They have 1% accuracy, which means 1 digit after the decimal sign. You have a potentiometer on the back side to adjust the reading according to DMM, but from 1.16 to 1.25 it will show 1.2, from 1.26 to 1.35 it will show 1.3 and so on. I got fooled from a seller's picture and description, but fortunately got a refund afterwards, because the info was wrong. They have corrected it since then. Look for 0.1% accuracy or better. Otherwise you can connect red line to any 3 to 28V source.

Since I gave up on class B with my weak cpu, I had nothing to do but watch the show in EMEA A and class B. I believe the Iranian guys didn't do that on purpose, but in the end both results are not valid in terms of defined rules. Not sure about UH, but it doesn't matter if it as a bug or done on purpose - still not a valid score. Well, it matters to some extent, because if it was done on purpose the user deserves some kind of punishment, but in both cases the result needs to be removed. For 3DMark 03, even if it is completely valid, the missing validation link renders it invalid for the competition. So it doesn't matter if you provide all the proof in the world. Rules are rules. Now, if you didn't count on sandbagging and had uploaded some lower, but valid scores earlier, you could still get to the finals when your top scores get removed. And if these placeholder scores were not valid, people would report them earlier and you would have had time to correct these flaws. You got screwed by the sandbagging. Just my 5c. About cyclone: I didn't pay attention to the screenshot and now it's gone, but it's really disappointing to see such thing from a respected overclocker. Don't know what he was thinking... We all know what is he capable of. When you don't have a good hardware to compete, just give up and save your good reputation. That's a shame if true . I still would like to see that screenshot though.

Oh, man. I don't know how you got that performance, but I'm 10 min behind and tried everything I know. Wazza doesn't seem to help. Good job.

I didn't see a difference, just like with other chips. Haven't tried some really low memory clocks (e.g. 1333), but single or dual channel, 2200 or 2666 - doesn't matter.