speed.fastest

All we need is hardware point, because overclocking is not based on money but skill. Thats why i think hardware point is more important than global. Like @Rasparthe said, maybe 8800GTS 512 will require more skill & knowledge than benching 980 Ti. Im not saying to disable global point, but what make unbalance between 2D & 3D is global point. With Core i3 Skylake you can get much point for global point, but you cant get the same global point with low end 3D card. We need solution for that. Sorry if my english is not good.

Let me start this, im just curious if my 5GHz efficiency compared to others is good or not. HWBot Link : http://hwbot.org/submission/3051250_speed.fastest_xtu_core_i7_2600k_1034_marks

Thats what i said, maybe my english is not good. As 2D & 3D bencher, if everyone want to change 3D with full GPU bound go contact to the developer. But whatever the benchmark im not again it. Even im not going to bench highest end to competitive for 1st place. My point is if someone want to change 3D just go to benchmark developer if they think 3D is 3D, not interrupted with Physics Score. HWBot is doing right i think. Overclock is my hobby, so im not affected with this change, still benching.

I agree with @cowgut, maybe Elite League point is good when point is separated from other league like Extreme, Enthusiast. So Elite in their own league and cant interrupting non pro league point and rank. They can compare but elite result will fair if cant interrupt non pro league & rank. F1 vs F1, not F1 vs Street Car Just my view from non pro league.

AFAIK 3D Benchmark is not all about GPU, CPU is affected too even in real world gaming (like Crysis 3, Watch Dogs, etc). But the different is not as much as 3DMark do (in this case powerfull CPU like i7 5960X, i7 6700K, i5 6600K). I think @xxbassplayerxx is right, for 3D maybe you should contact the benchmark developer. And as far as i know more resolution = less CPU dependant benchmark, like FSU is less CPU dependant than FS or 3DMark11 P. CMIIW.

Scoring system looks good, but i agree 1st place maybe should be 100, 85, 75 and the slowly downward for the 1st place competition

I think there is no problem with current Global Point Distribution. The problem is i think Hardware Point is based on position, not based on how much leading score from the baseline score. For baseline is based on hardware lowest score (HWBot can adjust the baseline if automatic baseline is too low or too high). I know we cant be perfect but at least we tried. Keep pushing it guys! Sorry if you dont understand my english.

REX 8600GT kah? Joss banget clocknya

Maybe Samsung HYK0, my HYK0 can run 2133+ 7-9-9-18 super tight timing with 2.175v XTU Stable with Hot Air. Try 1600mhz-1866mhz 7-8-8-24 1.5-1.75v if they can, Samsung for sure.

Looks good!

Wow, amazing!

Nice Score! But why triple channel

Ok thats understandable. Here my little thought about HWBot Scoring system : *Global Points = Its good system nothing wrong. *Hardware Points = Its hard to make good score with many submission in same hardware category. So whats make some submission is not valuable with this scoring system? Performance Points Let's add Performance Point to scoring system Performance Points is based on % score improvement from baseline score. Baseline score is lowest score in the hardware category. HWBot Staff can choose baseline score if the lowest score is too low (lets say lowest clock in cpu clock category). Hope this can help.

Thanks Bullant! And here little update only different Wazza method (not copy wazza) http://hwbot.org/submission/3052665_speed.fastest_superpi___32m_core_i7_2600k_6min_35sec_782ms

Or maybe need baseline score for every hardware and benchmark. Then score percentage from baseline score is what hardware point come from, more improvement from baseline score more hardware point. maybe possible. If score based on difficulty, maybe all benching with Extreme Cooling even the score is not good for Extreme Cooling.

Added, first from Indonesia in the maps

I think the problem hardware point is too low because hardware is not popular, even if your score is very good for the hardware. I think if we got more hardware point based on score, not based on popularity we can grow 3D bencher. Sorry if you dont understand my English...

Amazing Job!!!

Update with 2600K & Samsung, little faster http://hwbot.org/submission/3049636_speed.fastest_superpi___32m_core_i7_2600k_6min_36sec_719ms

When i do faster than 1m 02s 507ms the result is invalid, not matter what i use (2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.2). Using 2 different OS (Windows 7 x64 & Windows 10 x64). FYI i use AMD APP SDK 3.0, AMD Crimson Software 15.11. Maybe i do something wrong or any info? Thanks before

LOL! Pringles :v

This is amazing, i hope work on other board too

Ah okay. I didnt know that. So -30C is the limit

Wow, using this kind of water cooling you must join Extreme League. Im sure at stock settings your idle temp drop below Sub Zero.

Suhune ngeri boss