speed.fastest

Craaazyyy! GJ!

I don't think any human run Prime95 for daily usage

Wow, really good idea! I think for GPU is better based on Codename because many rebranded card. If not based on GPU architecture name (GCN, Kepler, Maxwell, etc).

As far as i know, overclocking is not about raw performance, but performance improvement over stock speed, except for World Record is different. Overclock Athlon 5350 to 4ghz maybe is harder than do 6700K to 6.5ghz. Thats why HWBot give Hardware Point (pure point for overclocking) and Global Point (for fastest overclocked system). So to make 3D popular you need to accommodate what people need, cheap oc. With cheap oc people will submit more and make your 3D point will naturally get higher point, even more than XTU if submission become more popular.

Actually CPU can throttling if they exceeding max safe temperature. Different CPU different limit. And actually CPU really hard to do stability test on high temperature and get good score (that mean without throttling).

4ghz 1.6v++ using DICE? What happened?

Wow! Really good!

I believe in @K404 Without Global overclocking will more natural. What about Global & WR Point only for Elite? So other than Elite does not affected by Global Point. Just my 2 cents

The problem with 3D is you can't get Global Point with cheap system. For me GTX 980 Cost is like my full 6 months full wages. So "cheap" for someone doesn't mean cheap for other. With 2D you can get Global Point even without expensive hardware because there is separate cpu core global point (1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, etc). In 3D only (1xGPU, 2xGPU, 3xGPU, etc) which is not like 2D. We need solution for that to separating category to make 3D competitive.

How about Global Point for 3D is based on GPU Generation like HD 7000 and GTX 600 is in same generation? If based on generation is too hard maybe based on GPU Family. Make the Global Point not many, but based on Top 20 GPU Generation if not based on Top 10 GPU Family? It's really hard to get Global Point for Low End 3D because there is no Global Low End 3D Category. Like @steponz said maybe IGP category can compete in Global IGP as CPU compete in core count like i3 Skylake?

Amazing result dude!

All we need is hardware point, because overclocking is not based on money but skill. Thats why i think hardware point is more important than global. Like @Rasparthe said, maybe 8800GTS 512 will require more skill & knowledge than benching 980 Ti. Im not saying to disable global point, but what make unbalance between 2D & 3D is global point. With Core i3 Skylake you can get much point for global point, but you cant get the same global point with low end 3D card. We need solution for that. Sorry if my english is not good.

Let me start this, im just curious if my 5GHz efficiency compared to others is good or not. HWBot Link : http://hwbot.org/submission/3051250_speed.fastest_xtu_core_i7_2600k_1034_marks

Thats what i said, maybe my english is not good. As 2D & 3D bencher, if everyone want to change 3D with full GPU bound go contact to the developer. But whatever the benchmark im not again it. Even im not going to bench highest end to competitive for 1st place. My point is if someone want to change 3D just go to benchmark developer if they think 3D is 3D, not interrupted with Physics Score. HWBot is doing right i think. Overclock is my hobby, so im not affected with this change, still benching.

I agree with @cowgut, maybe Elite League point is good when point is separated from other league like Extreme, Enthusiast. So Elite in their own league and cant interrupting non pro league point and rank. They can compare but elite result will fair if cant interrupt non pro league & rank. F1 vs F1, not F1 vs Street Car Just my view from non pro league.

AFAIK 3D Benchmark is not all about GPU, CPU is affected too even in real world gaming (like Crysis 3, Watch Dogs, etc). But the different is not as much as 3DMark do (in this case powerfull CPU like i7 5960X, i7 6700K, i5 6600K). I think @xxbassplayerxx is right, for 3D maybe you should contact the benchmark developer. And as far as i know more resolution = less CPU dependant benchmark, like FSU is less CPU dependant than FS or 3DMark11 P. CMIIW.

Scoring system looks good, but i agree 1st place maybe should be 100, 85, 75 and the slowly downward for the 1st place competition

I think there is no problem with current Global Point Distribution. The problem is i think Hardware Point is based on position, not based on how much leading score from the baseline score. For baseline is based on hardware lowest score (HWBot can adjust the baseline if automatic baseline is too low or too high). I know we cant be perfect but at least we tried. Keep pushing it guys! Sorry if you dont understand my english.

REX 8600GT kah? Joss banget clocknya

Maybe Samsung HYK0, my HYK0 can run 2133+ 7-9-9-18 super tight timing with 2.175v XTU Stable with Hot Air. Try 1600mhz-1866mhz 7-8-8-24 1.5-1.75v if they can, Samsung for sure.

Looks good!

Wow, amazing!

Nice Score! But why triple channel

Ok thats understandable. Here my little thought about HWBot Scoring system : *Global Points = Its good system nothing wrong. *Hardware Points = Its hard to make good score with many submission in same hardware category. So whats make some submission is not valuable with this scoring system? Performance Points Let's add Performance Point to scoring system Performance Points is based on % score improvement from baseline score. Baseline score is lowest score in the hardware category. HWBot Staff can choose baseline score if the lowest score is too low (lets say lowest clock in cpu clock category). Hope this can help.

Thanks Bullant! And here little update only different Wazza method (not copy wazza) http://hwbot.org/submission/3052665_speed.fastest_superpi___32m_core_i7_2600k_6min_35sec_782ms