wytiwx

no mod

maybe PL10 failed at that time, can't remember well, a few months ago

At first sight I thought it was Q8200

Is mem bandwidth of 750MHz/DDR3-1500 the experimental results? But in other words, if we have to use 3:5 for efficiency rather than raw mem freq in particular conditions, it doesn't matter whether there is a bug or not.

Well，if FSB and Mem freq is almost the same, then I think mem performance should be strap 400 ＜ 333 ＜266 ＜ 200. But if FSB and Mem freq scares too much, things will become complicate.

THX for the info.

I did some memory bandwith test by AIDA64, I don't think it has 3:5 bug for my EP45T-UD3R 1. E8400 (500x6), 400 strap, div 3:4, DDR3 1333 6-6-6, PL9 2. E8400 (500x6), 400 strap, div 3:5, DDR3 1666 6-6-6, PL9 3. E8400 (500x6), 333 strap, div 5:8, DDR3 1600 6-6-6, PL9

We all know that P45 has memory div 3:5 bug, but I still wonder: 1. Does this bug exist in all P45 boards? For exmaple, is in all DDR2 and DDR3 board? is in all chipset rev. A2 and A3? 2. If not all P45 board have this bug, how can we confirm that when we use 3:5 ?

Hahaha......no thx man, it's quite enough to keep crazy by LGA775

Well, CPU is the key you know

My percent overclock score is for Intel or for BCLK, the really highest percent is donw by AMD up to 300%+

If you don't have good D9GMH, maybe you can try those crazy nanya d-die just kidding

Crazy mem. Are you really sure the IC is nanya? Have you removed the heatsink?

so teach me please

hahaha, that would be a very big project which need all the OCer s.

Yep, actually two E7200 hit 700 FSB by now, both are Wolfdale-3M, not from Wolfdale-6M

Vnb 1.50V

C2D E7200, 730 done, batch Q748A https://hwbot.org/submission/4754186

updated 266 bus speed CPUs which did 700+ C2D E6300, 705 done, batch L632B. https://hwbot.org/submission/4740813

You 750+ FSB first

not yet

pump

yeah, your P5E3-P board is more crazy

I believe other people will make it from TaPaKaH's treasure mountain