alexmaj467

Thanks. A good memory, on an Intel platform would be much better.

Thanks. I do not know the benefits, I immediately changed the BIOS and did not try to use the native BIOS . I guess I did it because of better function Load-Line Calibration

Thanks. one of the eight went so well, he needs a SS. Would have been almost everywhere first. china,5603B171(2L604057)A1377

I can't get in more than 7 hours, on hwbot. uat works perfectly.

thanks I just forgot . unlock new cores i need to specify the number and have the result be in another section. And when i disable the processor cores , I submit the result to the category of how many physically there are cores in this model, without coming up with anything new.

Sorry my English. I forgot if I can disable AMD cores for cpu-z , pifast and superpi feed. My processor Athlon x2 7750BE above is overclocked if I disable the second core.

The screenshot shown is not A pcmark04 test, it is from another PCmark05 test

Sorry my English. This is Google translate. I read this topic , where it was said that the use of version 130 build 1.0.0 is allowed, in which you can set the priority of the process in real time. But the fact is that the use of real - time priority increases the result in the first three tests (Multithreaded test 1, Multithreaded test 2, Multithreaded test 3) almost twice and thus greatly differ the overall result from those who use build 1.1.0-1.3.0. And this applies only to processors with one core. To get a high result on a processor with one core but two threads you need to disable HT. I had to create this topic earlier before posting the results, but what's done is done. Let's decide whether it is possible to use the build version 1.0.0, if not then I will have to redo all the results of 754 socket , 939 socket and 478 socket. Perhaps those that I have posted with real time you can edit and disable them credit of points , they will as an example to calculate who will also use the 1.0.0 build. For example, the result of which I have not yet laid out. My old result Intel Celeron D 335 (2.80GHz, s478)_Speed__3708MHz__-__build_1.0.0__-__real-time_priority_=_6105_Marks My result at higher frequency, which has not yet been posted. Speed 4557MHz - build 1.0.0 - real-time priority = 8189 Marks Speed 4557MHz - build 1.0.0 - high or normal priority = 6021 Marks If you need to write a list of my results where I used the 1.0.0 build . so as not to waste time looking for them in my profile. The file of the version of the program I used can also be found here.

The Google translator. Let's find a program that accurately shows the bus and the multiplier for these systems, and add to the rules only for this socket that this program should be in the screenshot. And take the frequency of the final program is not CPU-Z and from another program. And from that time on, future results will only be checked for this socket.

And this edit in the screenshot you do not have AGP video card

responded on your command forum. You need to run the old version 1.78 without closing it to run the new version 1.83 or 1.86 and the new version will tab SPD with information..

Welcome to the team. Fix the result. you have one processor, not four at the same time on your motherboard .

CPU-Z versions after 1.80 do not display timings correctly and may not display the SPD tab on INTEL systems. What about that ?

I understood.

Question. Three results on different (processor, video card, RAM ) can be from one team member or only from three ?

The condensation is formed before I turn on the air conditioner in the room. It's summer, in the morning the room temperature is 25 Celsius, by 10 o'clock in the morning the sun shines through the window, and at this point in the room 32 degrees Celsius. At the time when the room temperature is from 30 to 33 and the condensate is formed. At this point, I turn on the air conditioner, and the condensate is not formed.

Cooling water how many degrees? This is a normal water tap in the kitchen +15 degrees Celsius. No special cooling I do not use. In the frequency test shows the temperature perfectly http://valid.x86.fr/px5jqz +29 Celsius Maybe you don't understand how I got the result in the first two tests (Multithreaded test 1 - test 2 ) ? Pass these tests in real time is not prohibited . And to pass the third test (multithreaded test 3 ) I use the code. @ECHO OFF WMIC process where name="PCMark04.exe" CALL setpriority "256"Sleep 70 //// Selected at random depends on each CPU and the frequency from 5 to 500.////WMIC process where name="PCMark04.exe" CALL setpriority "128"EXIT

in this message

Thanks. I have a good processor caught, for ordinary water supply..?

Not bad. Will be Pifast and SuperPi ? I will not return, the water is too warm in the tap, maybe in the winter again will get the 754 socket, will have more CPUs per year.

del

you can still better, my waterblock failed. my 6800gs can 481/662  with good water block Now I have a result of 15188 on 754 socket, with a frequency of 462/638 . It is below yours, but this is the maximum that is possible with this waterblock.

I don't have any powerful ATI video cards. overclocking 3d , I had not considered yet.

I didn't really do it that way (the assumption that will work ). I don't have 3850 or 4650, on something even weaker I don't want to go.