cbjaust

after intalling JRE 9ea+107 the cmd window opens and immediately closes and the GUI doesn't run. Previously had JRE 8u191 and it worked fine although the the checksum result after uploading was "invalid" and the result did not show up in the results for the CPU used (Core i7 4600U) but has a gold cup with the result being 1st out of 1. Uploading a result from 0.8.3 was fine: http://hwbot.org/submission/4030594_cbjaust_hwbot_prime_core_i7_4600u_3721.32_pps/ and it shows up normally in the rankings for i7 4600U CPUs. Edit: nevermind, uninstalling JRE8 stuffed up the paths in windows and the java couldn't be found. Adding the path to java in the batch file fixed it.

Yeah, the early AMD agesa was limited to the primary timings and affected all boards.

Maybe it's Windows 10.

yes, list of settings is comprehensive.

You did though: http://hwbot.org/submission/3984711_i.nfrar.ed_superpi___32m_phenom_ii_x2_570_be_13min_53sec_844ms/

Anyway well done to all participants, I was just glad to have one score that counted at the end.

I'm not, don't know about anyone else. When was the $@39@ controversy, did he have contributing scores to the Greek team effort that year that were later removed?

Were they not cheating?

Yeah, they're a novice making novice mistakes. CPU Frequency entered instead of Mainboard Reference Frequency.

It would want to be with 7GHz on the CPU driving it! Nice one.

Moot point in the end. As if any GTX 580 score was gonna last until the end.

Reference Frequency is for the board which is 100.12MHz not the CPU.

Just customise the instruction set to omit AVX/AVX2 from the mix before you run it. It's obvious to all that AVX instructions are a super heavy workload, I mean Intel downclock their CPUs for AVX loads FFS.

yeah, that's what I was trying to point out in my post above. And @FatBoyNotSoSlim my GTX 580 score is a hair better than your submission

Also my GTX 580 score http://hwbot.org/submission/4023899_cbjaust_3dmark___time_spy_geforce_gtx_580_1108_marks isn't being counted... I wonder if it's due to: a) I have a better score with a GTX 670 http://hwbot.org/submission/4006894_cbjaust_3dmark___time_spy_geforce_gtx_670_2512_marks/ b) AG-TAS has better scores with GTX 680 http://hwbot.org/submission/4021724_ag_tas_3dmark___time_spy_geforce_gtx_680_2677_marks and GTX 580 http://hwbot.org/submission/4021573_ag_tas_3dmark___time_spy_geforce_gtx_580_1132_marks/ or some combination of these factors or something completely different...

Just no Titan V for the time spy stage.

it is per nvidia card family so a 780 won't replace a 580 score. Not to say there aren't glitches though.

I spawned a new tab by middle clicking on the 292 for your P5E and added "&limit=300" to the URL in the new tab and then just found your top ref freq score in the list... This is the link: http://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?username=WhiteWulfe&mbModelId=1690&mbManufacturerId=188&limit=300

That's rubbish. I reckon even though macs has a better score on a different socket than his old score with AM2+ board/AM3 CPU, it's blocking yours anyway.

Just give it a recalc and refresh. it should then show in the rankings again... http://hwbot.org/submission/3416994_whitewulfe_reference_frequency_p5e_575.09_mhz

don't hold your breath! mods are thin on the ground and very busy.

@unityofsaints, you should try recalc you ref freq score, macs has put up a s754 entry that trumps his AM2+/AM3 score so your AM3 score should count now but last time I checked it wasn't showing even though the score it's still entered in the comp...

Apparently not. Valid link required...

They just haven't been reported yet or spotted by the ever fewer moderators around here. Windows 7 on the same hardware is fine.

have you got it in 16:9 ratio?