cbjaust

You've got five stages Also where do you find Coppermine-256 cored Celerons? or is that what the BIOS thinks it is when you run Coppermine PIII at 66MHz FSB Surely a youtube video should be optional or be able to be produced on request? Anyway good on you @GRIFF for coming up with the comp. I'll have a better chance to have a go at Round 2 with s462 unless the chipset limitations are too restrictive Cheers

@Antinomy, Ah I didn't look that closely! Guess that's why you're the hardware maestro! Cheers

I'm not sure about merging the two because the 1440 board is for Socket s1g1 which is DDR2 and hypertransport 1.0 whereas the 1440 (Pavilion dv6) board is for s1g4 which is DDR3 and hypertransport 3.0. It doesn't really bother me as long as the "unknowns" are fixed for the manufacturer and chipset. Cheers

here's the ad (only Dutch or Belgian though), it's €60... and a bigger picture:

Y you no allow 44BX?

Please correct database: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/1440_(pavilion_dv6)/ Currently the manufacturer is unknown, as is the chipset on the hardware page. It should be Hewlett-Packard for the manufacturer and 785GX for the chipset. I've been using the 1440 motherboard because at least it has the manufacturer and chipset correct even though it is in the socket s1g1 category and the CPU in my board is socket s1g4... validation: http://valid.x86.fr/fzpsrm Thanks.

@Bullant what IC's are in those A-DATA ram sticks of yours?

This forum communiy.hwbot.org... Only on hwbot.org are the wires crossed. I see new comments on score on the forum mostly, not on hwbot.org so I was initially confused about your complaint. Then I remembered that some usernames are screwy on hwbot.org. Yeah good thanks. same to you. Bullant - apols for the TC ?

Fantasatic result! -ozz your username and avatar does show up correctly in the forum, just not on hwbot.org - weird glitch.

nowhere near zen and chew, also don't know the efficiency delta between the Gigabyte and Asus boards, so it's difficult to guage the score in relative terms and I don't think I'm about to buy any AM4 Gigabyte boards anytime soon

Maybe for next time put a program on the border of the two screens to bridge the gap and tie the two screens together which will show that the screen was taken all at once. Unless it's something else I'm missing.

I know you've been doing good work on AM3 lately with SuperPi efficiency and it has paid off well right now. Good show.

who is questioning your score man?

Pretty slow but it's the first time I've run this kit at CAS 12

less efficient than current No.2 (https://hwbot.org/submission/963290_mad222_superpi___1m_athlon_ii_x2_240_14sec_422ms/) but 400 and then some MHz extra gets the job done.

Sometimes scores can disappear from the rankings but you can still find them via the hardware library tab on your page. Just click on the number under the submissions column to see a list of the first 20. To see more, for example up to a hundred results, add "&limit=100" to the end of the url (change the number if you need to see more). From there if you see any results that don't show in the rankings, just go to that entry and run a recalculate on it (top right of the page). Other than that if you had results actually deleted surely you would have had a notification? Another way to find results is to use the list in "My Wall" if you haven't removed the notifications, but that can be tedious if you need to go back a fair bit...

Interested in AMD Opteron 144 S939 and AMD Athlon 64 3000+. How about 12€?, but you have to let me know how much shipping is to Australia, post code 3169 first. I do want the boxes and everything. Cheers.

Why did you even bother uploading a score with timer inaccuracies. Oh, wait, I know why.

speak for yourself. the old "if everybody was jumping off a cliff would you?" question. As for tessellation, if nVidia didn't resort to shady methods to make AMD hardware look worse in regards to tessellation by cosying up to game devs who then tessellated the crap out of their games to no visual benefit, well then we probably wouldn't have gotten a tessellation control in the drivers in the first place.

What magic voodoo did you use to get to this score from https://hwbot.org/submission/3972950_gb_perth_3dmark___time_spy_extreme_radeon_rx_vega_56_3191_marks/ ?

Only changing LOD and Tessellation is allowed. Other settings not mentioned such as AA must not be altered.

For OCN Freezer Burn Comp (1/12/18 to 31/1/2019)

For OCN Freezer Burn Comp (1/12/18 to 31/1/2019)

For OCN Freezer Burn Comp (1/12/18 to 31/1/2019)

For OCN Freezer Burn Comp (1/12/18 to 31/1/2019)