cbjaust

haha, now you tell me! (USD$9.99 later - 4192919_cbjaust_geekbench4_multi_core_ryzen_7_1800x_30773_points/) Yeah PNG would be great. Thanks. Re: Skew, I found that CINEBENCH R15 would get a skew error warning quite a bit.

Does Geekbench4 have to be the paid version for it to hook into the result? I don't have Geekbench4 paid and BenchMate 0.7.1 doesn't recognise any result once the GB has finished and uploaded the result to the Geekbench browser... By the way, I was changing the Bus Speed during the GB4 run with ASUS' TurboV Core and BenchMate didn't complain. Edit: Feature request - is it possible and/or likely to support saving the screenshots as .PNG? The .JPG is poor quality especially when it comes to CINEBENCH renders. Info: Motherboard & CPU used: C6H & Ryzen 7 1800X Operating System used ( 32/64bit, exact OS version, stripped or not): Windows 10 Version 1903 (OS Build 18362.239) Drivers installed for chipset: AMD Chipset Drivers Version 1.6.13.0400 What you tried to solve the problem : posted here ?

done ?

I'm guessing the usual rules apply, specifically for SuperPi 32M "PI calculation is done!" dialogue box must be shown as well as the usual CPUz tabs? If that is the case, do you want us to report non-compliant results (or should we just wait until the end ?)?

Just make legacy 3DMarks CPU benches instead

Yes, audio driver installed and working fine. Heaven runs just fine standalone.

Did you ever figure this out? I get the same thing. 1090T and Vega 56 Windows 7 x64

On both the Windows 7 and Windows 10 I'm using for Challenger Round 2 Stage VI (AMD CPU+GPU) and Stage III (6-cores only) the latest SystemInfo 5.18.705 crashes out on GPU detection. The previous one, 5.17 is fine. This is on 1090T and every graphics card I've used (HD 3870 X2. HD 7970, R9 280X, RX Vega 56). As an aside, my 2¢ is SystemInfo should be pretty recent (especially if it is bugged like I found) and also in the case of 3DMark it should be the most up to date one at the time of the start of the comp or newer if it has been updated in the meantime. For the wrong background at least macsbeach98 used one which was in circulation more or less concurrently as the Cheapaz Chips one so it sort of serves the intended purpose of the rule but not to the letter.

+1, I second this notion.

Thank you.

Hi, please edit the two entries linked below so that the Graphics Card manufacturer is ATi and the Graphics card model is left blank (the VGA Product section is wrong - somehow I saved it as an MSI Lightning and there's no such thing in a 3870 X2) : https://hwbot.org/submission/4169270_cbjaust_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_3870_x2_11570_marks/ https://hwbot.org/submission/4168635_cbjaust_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_3870_x2_11381_marks/ And tell what's the secret to fixing stubborn mistakes (short of deleting and reuloading the offending results)! thanks.

Have a board (Asus A7V) and ram but no Duron and no Radeon 9100. Closest is a thunderbird athlon 900 that does 1100Mhz and a Radeon 9700 Pro that is similarly unimpressive.

A Brexit OS would be super slow surely.

@Antinomy did you get access to what you need to merge these yet? Thanks

Are you going to pull entries submitted prior to this rule that don't conform?

Can we use Open Hardware monitor again? My daily happens to be in the Legacy AMD category (FX-8350/R9 280X) but HWiNFO always causes a BSOD Open Hardware Monitor works just fine though.

At the very least remove points and make this benchmark truly pointless.

Comp opens on 5/5/2019 12:00 UT... maybe that's why it isn't accepting your entry...

For this submission: https://hwbot.org/submission/4127244_cbjaust_gpupi_v3.3_for_cpu___100m_fx_8350_53sec_747ms Under Memory Details please change the Product from Trident Z to TridentX i missed this at the time and can't edit since the comp has ended. thanks in advance!

yep, same for me

Even if i had or could obtain the necessary hardware at reasonable cost, I think the added hassle of futzing around with recording a video of every potential result would rule me out. A one off video to verify a result is one thing but making a video every run is just too much to ask.

You've got five stages Also where do you find Coppermine-256 cored Celerons? or is that what the BIOS thinks it is when you run Coppermine PIII at 66MHz FSB Surely a youtube video should be optional or be able to be produced on request? Anyway good on you @GRIFF for coming up with the comp. I'll have a better chance to have a go at Round 2 with s462 unless the chipset limitations are too restrictive Cheers

@Antinomy, Ah I didn't look that closely! Guess that's why you're the hardware maestro! Cheers

I'm not sure about merging the two because the 1440 board is for Socket s1g1 which is DDR2 and hypertransport 1.0 whereas the 1440 (Pavilion dv6) board is for s1g4 which is DDR3 and hypertransport 3.0. It doesn't really bother me as long as the "unknowns" are fixed for the manufacturer and chipset. Cheers

here's the ad (only Dutch or Belgian though), it's €60... and a bigger picture: