cbjaust

Cool, when are you proposing to run this and for how long? As an aside I think three months is way too long for Cheapaz Round 1.

Please add Asus FX505DU https://valid.x86.fr/9lausw AMD Socket FP5 | Ryzen SOC | Carrizo FCH Asus Laptop ASUS TUF Gaming FX505DU Thanks

no point, CPU-Z won't tell them apart. All the validations for Orleans core CPU Frequency are the F2 variants (ADA3800IAA4CN (F2) or ADA3800IAA4CW (F2)). Until someone shows up with the F3 variant (ADA3800IAA4DH (F3)) or the 45W one (Lima - ADH3800IAA4DE (G1)) there's no point adding a category for the missing ones.

I haven't seen complaints regarding 3DM11 and systeminfo, now it looks like I need to check how the not latest version of 3DM11 scores ?

Where the rule says the latest 3DMark11 is required, it means version 1.0.179.0 right?

Might be a question for W1zzard, the author of GPU-Z over at the TPU Forums for what it's worth on the Crosshair VI Hero with the 2200G GPU-Z gets a reading for Default Clock just fine for me at least at the time:

Please add TYAN Thunder K8SRE (S2891) it's the board in the TYAN Transport GT24 GT24B2891 barebones chassis and as such the BIOS states the model number as GT24-B2891. CPU-Z validation https://valid.x86.fr/ri8b5g Chipset • AMD-8131™ HyperTransport™ PCI-X Tunnel • NVIDIA nForce™ Prof. 2200 (CrushK8-04 Pro) So going by the convention I'm guessing it should go in as the Thunder K8SRE (S2891) but maybe Thunder K8SRE (GT24-B2891) could work as well. Thanks

It was an accidental entry of an R20 score in the R15 category. I saw the error and edited the score to an R15 one and uploaded the corresponding R15 screenshot. Hopefully that's OK. This is the R20 score that I entered into the R15 category by mistake: https://hwbot.org/submission/4381500_cbjaust_cinebench___r20_athlon_3000g_1017_marks/ (I thought I was on the R20 form...)

Copy and paste the url from the futuremark result to the compare url on the entry form

I think that's because the Hardware Monitoring part of SytemInfo crashes silently at the loading screen before the benchmark runs. Thus the result has hardware monitoring disabled even though it's selected in the options to be on.

Don't know how comprehensive or correct this is and I don't know for sure if the blanks should be TRUE or FALSE and also the ASUS X570 Crosshair boards are totally absent... but maybe this will help.

OpenCL is not installed properly or doesn't support CPU. Bring on GPUPI v4!

set up a profile for FS in the driver control panel? can select method of Crossfire then.

nice find, how did you figure it out?

took you a while to add this the hwbot. nice score

and yet you didn't

@marco.is.not.80 https://hwbot.org/submission/4365963_cbjaust_3dmark11_physics_ryzen_5_3600x_20578_points/

or instead of VSR, I also use Eyefinity. Benchmate sees the primary display and takes the screen shot of that. For things like CB R15 Extreme I used a combination of VSR on my main monitor along with a secondary monitor.

Thanks, I also have a sandbag I didn't need that is 0.58% better...

@marco.is.not.80 for benches like these where more screen real estate is needed, I usually have an AMD graphics card so I enable Virtual Super Resolution on my 1920x1200 screen and use the next reolution up - 2560x1600. Yes, you have to have drivers installed, yada yada, whatever. It works and I don't have to invest in a proper Dell 30" 16x10 screen or a new fangled 4k screen.

If you have a higher score you don't have to delete your old one. Just do a recalc on the better score if it isn't getting ponts.

Will entries made on or before 2nd of February using Open Hardware Moinitor be removed from the competition?

Yes, limit CPU clocks for sure.

@superpatodonaldo, I don't think so. Also, last I read, the stages were placeholders and yet to be finalised.

What about a GPUPI for CPU per core AMD DDR3 stage?