-
Posts
1353 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by Farjam
-
Game Theory - Core i9 10900K @ 7171MHz - 8sec 840ms PiFast
Farjam replied to shar00750's topic in Result Discussions
Well done, At least this one is working compare to that steeringwheel lol -
Yeah my chip was like that too, only 2 strong cores, and at the end degraded because of some crazy cinebench 11.5 runs and almost lost 200Mhz on 6 cores. It was many years ago but i'll check my benching tools and also my memory lol , feel free to contact me at farjam1990@gmail.com (or "farjam_6990" on instagram) to check things, i believe i should have my old OSs and some other tools on our old shed's pc lol
-
Doc.Brown - Phenom II X6 1090T BE @ 6065MHz - 4sec 16ms wPrime - 32m
Farjam replied to Radi's topic in Result Discussions
Damn i missed testing AMDs so much ! good job mate, nice efficiency on this clock -
elmor - Ryzen 7 1800X @ 5364MHz - 2454 cb Cinebench - R15
Farjam replied to Splave's topic in Result Discussions
when was the last time amd took a meaningful cpu wr? nice work -
nice
-
Hi guys i'm using this method but strangly those edges were not a problem at all [maximus viii gene], i'm just using some thick Tape,they fix cpu on socket and also help the die to handle pot pressure,thats a messy method but works fine in short times. pot directly on die[gelid between them] = cinebench 6200 and xtu 6140mhz and it was good for a chip that can not pass cinebench more than 5900 and 5800 xtu with "pot on ihs" method i had not grizzly and i was using a [maybe] rotten Gelid , but i used the same thermal paste for those bench sessions.
-
Farjam - Core i7 6700K @ 6140MHz - 2091 marks XTU
Farjam replied to websmile's topic in Result Discussions
Thank you dear Albrecht for answer -
Farjam - Core i7 6700K @ 6140MHz - 2091 marks XTU
Farjam replied to websmile's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks behzad and michael, this run was without Slow-mode edit: damn i missed save file for 2101 : http://www.8pic.ir/images/v8j1qhuzcoxizi4zpla9.jpg -
nacho_arroyo - 2x GeForce GTX 980 Ti - 618188 marks Aquamark
Farjam replied to Leeghoofd's topic in Result Discussions
nice -
atisoc0936 - Core i7 4770 - 1178 marks XTU
Farjam replied to Behzad Tak's topic in Result Discussions
Eival Mehdi jan, strong as before -
Farjam - Core i7 6700K @ 5810MHz - 2016 marks XTU
Farjam replied to websmile's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks guys, when you have "behzad Tak" on your side there is no way the performance can go wrong lol