K404

(and it's not my chip, it's still here..... and going nowhere)

Congrats on entering the 8.2GHz club with Netburst!

Another idea: would it be possible to add a feature where your CPU or GPU global scores are given an average? (separate averages for 1x/2x/3x/4x GPU too) What about average ranking for hardware categories? I would like an easy way to see all my global rankings all in one place

Don't hate the player, hate the game. He didn't decide to make server boards un-overclockable, he didn't decide that even in a category with only a few submissions, the #1 spot would be worth 60 points. Go complain about this score because it's an all-out world record and the GPUs are on water: http://hwbot.org/submission/2330095_mtech_unigine_heaven___xtreme_preset_%28dx11%29_4x_radeon_hd_7970_8030.63_dx11_marks (i'm just picking an example score)

8K broken! Very nicely done! Pretty cool to see people making the effort to run 4-way out of their own wallet

What would people think if I suggested that AM3 is closed to new submissions until the new wrapper is released?

This might come across as disrespectful to the people who made the original wrapper. Tonight, I ran AM3 without the wrapper, once... and got a score of 462K. Using the wrapper, I had two scores < 400K, 9 crashes and eventually, a score of 420K How did this pile of bunny pass internal testing and how could it be claimed to "not change anything?"

Very nice double whammy Dewi!

Sweeeeetttttttt!

Please can you re-run all these GT230 benchmarks...... and follow the rules for submission? I see no FPS details in ANY of your scores and the resolution is hidden in 3 of your scores. In one result, your GPU-Z is hidden.

I got one of these boards a wee while ago and i've only just got around to hooking it up. I can't install my GPUs See photo Any help would be appreciated.

I don't have a board

I think with only 64SP, memory is not as important. Sure, another 30-50MHz will give a better score, but we both know that is not the problem with my score right now I have a question (you can answer in PM if you want) .....what version of 3DV are you using?

Thanks for posting I don't understand how your baseline is so high compared to everyone elses. I had normal scaling, but from a much lower starting point. You are also running at 100 BCLK/ PCI-E and my PCI-E was 106 (X58) Here are my two results from this morning. I found your driver choice of 258.96 to be better than any 28x drivers or 275.33, but I found 197.45 to be better for me. In my notes I have commented that SLI is worse with a 64-bit OS, but I did not go into detail. I will have to re-test that theory. All my other scores are normal and are in-line with other peoples scores. Your Vantage is the only weird one. Here is a quick chart I put together. I do not think CPU MHz will affect GPU tests with this level of GPU power.

What % of the recalc is done?

Freakiest picture ever. Time to listen to Aphex Twins COME TO DADDY at antisocial volume

:D :D

There you go

Ah only jiss notic'd thiss. R yoo tryna say ah'm funny or summat? Eh?

Dunno if this is a bug or just an oversight.... On the search page, searching for 1x GPU results includes dual-core/PCB cards like the GTX295/590/690/5970/6990 etc

I'll be honest.... it's not the answer I was hoping for

Obviously, it is too late for this cycle of 3DMark, but if FM could make a benchmark that is truly 100% GPU, even 5 years after release*, that would be awesome Based on how GPUs advance and CPUs advance, CPUs are "always" the bottleneck. To get a better 3DMark score, I need a better CPU much more than I need a better GPU. IMO, that's a bit wrong multi-GPU scaling is way off as well, especially at the top-end *I appreciate it is very difficult to guess how to code to make something future-proof

I liked that I could use my imagination to guess what the "bigger picture" was Same as 3D06 Deep Freeze

My results will be waiting I will not submit until a decision is made Cheers bro!