K404

Doesn't that mean PhysX is a feature of the GPU?

That is indeed a nice CPU! How did everyone else get on?

Bro, you really should have known that wasn't correct. GT4 11x higher than GT2/3 and Gold medal by ~150%......

Very crap screenshot. No CPU-Z, no GPU-Z. How many cards? Maybe staff should start banning people (short-term. Few weeks?) who clearly don't read the rules for submission.

Very crap screenshot. No CPU-Z, no GPU-Z. How many cards? Maybe staff should start banning people (short-term. Few weeks?) who clearly don't read the rules for submission.

So..... going back to my original question....... :p Vivi..... you sound very much like Sam with that binning "technique"

You're gonna bin all those in...< 2 days?

I don't want to see pictures of Massman sleeping. It would be....wrong, like the OC community is getting a window into something very private.

That's called...."speech" Kidding! My nephews are coming over today, i'm sure I just put a jinx on their behaviour.

http://hwbot.org/submission/2298895_8_pack_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_580_137024_marks Still using Ivy ES

I disagree with Christian.

life = explained.

Was the difference in score put down to software version + memory?

lautajo lives in turkmenistan.

Lol!

That's f***ing cruel!

Maybe your optimism-binning technique needs work?

Can any MHz submissions with these versions be trusted?

Not changing the version number won't help with validation. The bugged version can be used and it will be harder to spot

Is anyone having any problems with this at the mo? I keep getting a "submitting saved results failed" Cheers!

If the voltage cannot be controlled by software, be a man and hard-mod it. If a voltmod guide hasn't yet been made, be the person to change that.

zOMG! >300MHz advantage! Score is bugged!

Oh..... VERY nice! Great idea!!! A suggestion..... when a user hits "save screenshot," could the software minimise itself before taking the screengrab? The software can't be entirely hidden without obscuring the screenshot button and sometimes there's so much info on-screen that it's guaranteed to cover something important. Thanks! EDIT: Thankyou very much Also.... could it request GPU-Z at the same time as CPU-Z, to speed things up by a few seconds? I know CPU-Z can only be opened one instance at a time, but I always open CPU-Z and GPU-Z together and that's never crashed my system. No-one knows CPU-Z better than you.... if multiple instances are being opened with this software, is it possible to "re-use" part of the code from the first instance to open the 2nd/3rd/4th instances faster?

You missed my question? Me: "Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?" You: "No." ....but.....it IS down to D3D by the looks of things. I guess it's a mute point. Benchmark fix = benchmark fix

So...... changing a D3D setting fixes AM3, but the fix isn't related to D3D?