FUGGER

Going by SP alone is not wise, try a random retail over something someone is passing on or get a binned chip from a trusted source. You want a chip that can do 5.3Ghz with HT enabled on AIO

Thanks, I am getting there on the HERO, this score was with 6 cores

Grats, this will be hard to catch

I reloaded to confirm, other benches have other errors too.

No benefit from raid, I tested with dual and quad optane.

Really strong run

haterpluszero *backups

I see there is a tolerance to HPET precision and others with some slop.

Same with Ycruncher, my 1B wr gave me 20 points. I dont care about points so I am not complaining, I am just pointing out that the reward is off so that my WR did not make it to front page and got zero attention and you guys know how I love attention.

Mat if you want a link to your page from XS I will add the tab, I do the same for HWBot.

The easy way: Windows 7 on modern platforms (xtremesystems.org) Currently supports Z490 and X570 chipsets. Runs PCM10 fine and you can load display drivers correctly

Windows 10 Pro registered, I see data files popping up as I run

I downloaded BM and when I run 1b or 2.5b the data never fills in on screen yet it has data file in directory. I am still unable to submit.

Thanks, about to overtake

I tried from two different OS drives. I can submit to 1b but not 2.5b

I have been considering a chip identification guide as most of my ES chips are blank. No way to read the QR code or cross reference the code given back. But there are visible differences in socket 775 chips over the generations to tell what core it is for example.

QS chips are binned 00000 chips can drop cores and no one can tell skew @ TDP I dont chase points or I would have put more obscure stuff up in categories.

The ebay saller is a troll using 3175X to catch seaches, that is an early ES XEON 8170 I also believe that ebay seller is showing CPUID from two different chips, a 205W 8180 with cores disabled (overclocked) and a 165W 8170 Cisco Intel Xeon 8170 Hexacosa-core (26 Core) 2.10 GHz Processor Upgrade - Socket 3647 - 26 MB - 35.75 MB Cache - 64-bit Processing - 3.70 GHz Overclocking Speed - 14 nm - 165 W - 192.2°F (89°C) UCS-CPU-8170 (compsource.com)

There is a difference between XEON-W 8180 ES and 3175X, all 8180 ES are labeled as 3175X in this database. There is different ES revisions. Reviewers are sent QS and retails, QS is labeled as ES but will usually have a complete CPUID and marked (ES). Normally reviewers will see QS chips. The difference is the max TDP, 3175X is 255W and the regular XEON is 205W I can disable any cores. I can also run in Penta or Quad channel. My chip is a retail 3175X

Wrong bench section, 7 zip in Winrar category.

If people cannot handle the bench duration you shouldn't play. You are chopping off everything PCM10 is good for and it should be weighing the GPU, memory, and SSD in the score and not just the CPU.

Thanks, I will show the new raid soon. Waiting on confirmation on performance numbers are incorrect. The driver relies heavily on caching by default. 500GB/s 4K randoms...

PCMark10 scales with Mhz MSDT PCMark10 Extended scales with cores + Mhz HEDT (consider keeping) a 5950X passed me last night and I will take it back with Intel Monday. When you retire benchmarks like RealBench, can you please leave the score boards(history) up? The SSD stuff was busted, took insane hardware to beat #2. I posted up Octo E16's and quad Optanes. Good to see changes, maybe a ticket/ticker front page when a WR broken. Yos, I am not running ramdisks. Strong disks and cache go so far as you know, it takes a well rounded machine and too much time to re run and tweak. I would like points and want more competition, I was passed last night by a 5950X and I will take it back Monday, Maybe Tuesday.

VPII should have been recognized for taking the PCM7 WR for a moment (few days) with the 5950X

Odd, fixed