der8auer

Thanks guys The bottom part is nickle plated copper and the top is made of black anodized aluminium. The mounting frame and backplate are made of stainless steel. Thx PJ! Not very exotic. The pics I made of the internals had a bad quality that's why I did not publish them yet. It's a 6-holes design.

Okay I'm realy annoyed now.. Spent 3 days to get the correct performance and to unbug the system with these crappy AMD drivers and when I just wanted to start the 2nd Lightning died out of nowhere on stock clocks.

Yes it was IDE related The memory issue was due to wrong subtimings. I had to set all the subtimings manually. Now I can also use 2133 MHz divider. I'm aiming for about 120-125 MHz BCLK for benching. According to Hicookie the board switches to the external PLL at 133 MHz like you said. Thanks!

Thanks PJ. Gonna test it now.

I don't understand why I can boot up to 145 BCLK but just 106 into windows? And only 102 BCLK are benchstable... Also I can not go above the 1866 memory divider. If I used 2133 or above it doesn't boot anymore. Pretty much same settings / voltages like Pieter used in the first post.

Hey there After publishing the RAPTOR3 few days ago I'd like to present my new RAPTOR SLIM to you. The slim version fits on all comon high end cards and is triple and quad SLI/Crossfire capable. Additionally I created a professional packaging for the SLIM. The RAPTOR3 will come in the same packaging btw An extra for you: This unit has worldwide FREE shipping!

Yes we will

We had the same issue. But we just met at my home for a session and will spread the results we did together on our different accounts. It's the best if you can combine the hardware with your team members.

PJ, CeBit is only interesting for me to meet the Overclockers

Alright, let's get the thread going. Confirmed NeoForce Nick Shih Oanvoanc Pepinorang Perica_barii Rewarder SF3D Slamms Smoke Considering Der8auer K404 Leeghoofd M.Beier Zzolio

Anything new here? Are there any overclockers actually using the ASUS tool?

I already sold 5 within 2 days so this is not true This pot is taking a very long time to manufacture that's why there is such a high price. Also I'm putting a lot of work into my pots and I'm not willing to gift them away. You buy such a high quality product once and can use it for many years where as you buy 10 x CPUs for binning every year. That doesn't make sense Of course you can also buy a cheaper pot which only contains a 4-holes structure. The choice is yours. If you want quality - you have to pay for it. The design is patented for a very simple reason. Here in Germany everybody could patent this design. Means you could use my pictures to get a patent and say it would be your product. The result is that I would not be allowed to sell my own products anymore. Therefore I need a patent to protect myself. edit: I will also offer cheaper pots in future. Still this will stay the absolute high-end-product

Thanks guys @ Jimba: Well... I'm taking EUR, USD.... Of course you can always change a 7 ghz Ivy 1:1

Well German engineering is expensive but very good If you have a pot like that you won't need any other in the near future.

12 mm so it's directly at the corner of the high end GPUs like GTX680 and 7970 but not underneath because this would have a negative effect on the heat transfer. edit: Thanks for your comments, guys

RAPTOR3 is the result of over a half year of testing, optimization and development in cooperation with German engineers. We completely revised the structure to create the best GPU pot available. Thin arms allow a very fast cool-down while the structure in the middle reduces temperature ups and downs for the best temperature control. Additional slots at the bottom of the pot dispense the LN2 to all four chambers and reduce the bubbling significantly. A black anodized aluminium plate at the bottom in combination with the nickle-plated copper perfects the design. The new stainless steel mounting system will give you the maximum contact pressure and using the stainless steel backplate you don't risk to damage your GPU by bending the PCB. And to protect my work: Patent pending!

That's a very interesting idea So only freeze the global points but you can still submit and recieve hardware points?

No... Doesn't sound like a benchmark Btw: http://rog.asus.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?153-OC-KnockOut Looking at these forums I have the feeling that there are not many people using OCKO

Doesn't realy look like that... I remember Dino posting on facebook that there won't be any BIOS versions with big improvements due to the high amount of pcb layers.

Gj there Stephan

gj mate

My Skype name: live:roman_6

Thank you

I would not replace benchmarks just to replace them. Currently we have a good base of benchmarks which is working nice. Why touch a system which is running fine? If there is a new one coming out we can think about replacing and older benchmark with it. As long as there are no good alternatives there is no need to change anything. For example 3DMark12 is ready and tested. We can publish a poll and ask the community about the replacement. If you find a decent 2D benchmark we can for example take away the global points from PiFast. 2D needs a special treatment imo. We have single and multi threaded benchmarks. Thus a single threaded benchmark should replace a single threaded benchmark to keep a variety of benches.