Massman

What's wrong with the video?

Hm. You are absolutely right. I'll revoke the ban on ES for this competition. For the February challenge it's already on the frontpage. In case you want to file a complaint => http://hwbot.org/forum/private.php?do=newpm&u=47.

Alright, competition page is ready. Fyi, you must use this competition background: http://hwbot.org/blog/wp-content//hocfeb12.jpg Good luck all!

Nice!

Haha! I wonder if Elmor is allowed to compete this year ...

No ES. //edit: scratch that. Too close to the end of the comp to make a call on this. Sorry .

Okay, made a new topic

Impressive man! Nice work!

can you send the file to pieter at hwbot dot org?

the extention doesn't matter.

It's gonna be a little different this year.

Link. Post. Share.

Just downloaded the latest V1.0 AM3 version from the download section and ran the bench. No issues here.

Hm, the size is exactly 0 bytes. How did you save the file?

Xbeatx: I just tried logging in with your account and "my profile" seems to work. Maybe try to log out and log back in again?

Hm, issues here as well. Just to be sure ... you did use the V1.0, right?! Not any of the beta versions.

Right here: //edit Lol, dude ... :D If I were Evga, I'd pay you not to talk about the Untouchable's capabilities anymore. Just like this: Abercrombie offer the folks from Jersey Shore to not wear their clothes on air.

Nice. GTX285 + untouchable + dryice = 950MHz core GTX285 + untouchable + ln2 = 1025MHz core Conclusion: untouchable gives more mhz

Damn, mis-read. Multi-CPU: allowed Multi-GPU: not allowed.

Yes. I'm pointing out that in none of the million spam threads you posted all over the internet, there's anything but pure advertising regarding the Untouchable. I don't have a problem with advertisment; it's part of the game. Just don't pretend it's something close to an evidence-based review or comparison of some sort. //edit: once again, for the record, I think it's absolutely awesome that Evga released the Untouchable! Triple thumbs up for that!

Take what as a man? When I see this product, I figure: "okay, this is interesting for low-end/mainstream cards as well to repair broken ones, but it probably won't magically turn a shit card into a super one". All your posts scream: "this makes my card go super-dooper crazy fast", claiming not only a 100MHz boost on your reference GTX285, but also a record-breaking 1600MHz on your HD 6670 (+200MHz from 1.4G). All thanks to the Untouchable. All I (and others) ask for is some evidence to back up these big claims. And you just don't deliver. Again, I'm sure this can boost in some cases, but by how much is a very big question mark. Again, two thumbs up for Evga for releasing this thing and I'm really, really looking forward to see what other users can do with this thing. But, when it comes to objective, factual, evidence-supporting claims ... you have given none. You are doing very well advertisement-wise, though

Apparently, most of the bans were awarded because the report had an url in it. One of the ways to detect a spambot is checking for URLs.

The problem is that Chiller says he has valid comparisons which clearly show that the Untouchable is giving 100-200MHz boost on several cards. But when we ask more information, we can see nothing factual that supports his comments. So, although he is making bold claims, we still have nothing. Even if the Untouchable would give less than 20MHz boost on average and not be able to turn an average card into a great card, this is still a pretty cool product. Thumbs up for Evga for actually putting this in production!

Yes, but only your best one will count.

1400? I thought it was 1600MHz with Untouchable ...