Massman

Noxon: what scores are removed? Hardware sharing issue suck ass , mostly because it's damn hard to translate the facts of scores into real-life situations. Anyway, I'll restore Pederss', I apoligise big time and want to find a solution for Noxon and Nanok

Must've been confused by another user of the team posting scores with pretty same cpu, gpu's, memory, OS and so on. Those are pretty much the symptoms that trigger the words 'hardware sharing' in my head. Feel free to throw me the worst words you have, they don't harm me . Anyway, before this turns into some kind of Danish mudthrowing contest let's get things straight: 2 scores, 4 X2's. Who's X2's? I will have no problem admitting my mistake, if I made one

LOL. Government of country X decides: "From now on death sentence is no longer a punishment" => Let's undo all deaths? (I admit, metaphore is a bit exagerated, shows my point though)

You should be able to delete them, I think? If you click on the "+" icon in front of the score, do you see a wastebin icon appearing underneath the details of that particular score? If yes, click it. I don't really understand why you're so eager to clean up your scores. Points/result ratio is a worthless statistic, because all you have to do to have the best ratio is own the SuperPi 1M world record and delete all your other scores. Furthermore, your ratio will probably be screwed by all the 0.x point scores you have. Next to that, it's also interesting for other users to compare their best scores against your average scores. I know that when I'm benching, I check out scores that are a bit better than mine to compare what I need to work on.

Looking good Cdawall, looking good Trying to get my hands on an X6800 to get this baby running a few marks better

Instead of 'copy', I clicked 'edit', hence the reason why his score was E7300 all of the sudden. Now I copied and still messed it up

Might have been because I screwed things up when I created the E7300 category ...

Sorry for the inconvenience, SOF, but sometimes people just misread the information they get. Three people who bench together a lot submitting scores with almost identical setups makes certain people jump to conclusions and shout out the two words 'hardware' and 'sharing', hence why we asked and not assumed. Problem is that either way causes people to respond as if it's some kind of deliberate try to snoop away points. In the past, I blocked scores for the reason "hardware sharing", turned out no sharing => mad people knocking on my door. If we raise questions regarding sharing, some people think we think they cheat => mad people knocking on the door as well . That's why I love it when people just agree with the possibility of hardware sharing and just provide everything what's needed to clear their name, just like Joe and Stummer did. If you have nothing to hide, there's no reason not to give everything away . Now ... since I've noticed Michael is tearing it up (again) ... let's all turn on the benchrigs ...

Added. Please use the helpcenter (bottom of forum) for any future request .

Thanks, unblocked your score :-). Sorry for the inconvenience. In the future, when you bench quite similar setups, please give us a heads-up, so that we are not confused and don't block scores. Thanks

I blocked the scores due to hardware sharing (didn't you get an email?), however I seem to be wrong :-). Can you please post pics of cpu's and mobo's? Then I'll unblock the score and give you my sincere apoligies

Yeah we did, now drop it. This issue has been solved, both Stummerwinter and Joe_cool provided more than the necessary pictures. Let's get back at benching.

added

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1668&name=Core+2+Q9650+(3Ghz)+(0)

@GPRHellas: link @JMke: link

Good, it's settled then ;-).

I know they all had their own CPU, don't know if they all had their own GFX cards as well. I'm sure either Marc or Sergio will help us out here :-).

Seems like a driver-edited screenshot to me.

What is this?

Too be honest, that sounds far more logical than my argument . You either compete against one card or multiple cards.

Does it seem fair that people buy one dual-gpu card and would have to compete against people who buy two?

You can't, that function is a work-in-progress

If I had them, I'd be glad to do so, but unfortunatelly ...

If it would be shared with the community, I don't see why we would have a problem with it .

4 gpus might be X2 x 2, no? Well, it's at least possible to run CF-X under XP, all you need are modded drivers ...