Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Massman

Members
  • Posts

    20467
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Massman

  1. Are you sure the first score is out of line? Looking at the third in your ranking, it seems that your SM2 and SM3 runs are a bit too low? Vendeta has a valid FM link, so I'm not really suspecting a cheat here. It's always possible, but I like to follow the non-cheat paths before I follow the others .
  2. Guys, let's not turn this thread into a mud-throwing festival, please . Both Tiborrr and Lunatic have valid arguments here: Tiborrr actually made a very well-based and good argumented thread about some weird scores and in particular why they are weird, these kinds of threads help us A LOT. Lunatic is right, though, that this can be seen as a personal attack, although I'm convinced it was not meant as a personal attack. Please, let's chill down and wait for Bwanasoft/Lunatic to give HWbot arguments why these scores are not fishy nor weird. The scores have been blocked, because they are under moderation, not because we have made a final verdict yet.
  3. Both ways described here are ILLEGAL at HWBot.
  4. Don't take HWbot's action personal; the scores are not in line with the others, not even close and thus are suspicious. The gpu-z program acts not normal as well, so it's our privilege to take the scores out of circulation untill we can see them as normal. Not submitting to HWBot is a choice you make.
  5. Results that are suspicious are blocked untill they are not suspicious anymore. Unblocking is ALWAYS an option.
  6. W00T, we broke 3K points
  7. My initial thought as well
  8. Jmke: it's a bug that happens with certain motherboards/ram/os/... combinations. I've had the issue on my K6/2 as well.
  9. Scores should never be deleted. Can you give more details about score/rig, going to try and look it up .
  10. Just leave the windows open. If no information visible in the program, no one will say it's a lack of verification. The lack of details is due to services, iirc.
  11. Not for every day pc user, that's for sure. Benchers will buy it if it's worth the extra $'s compared to regular oc boards. Madshrimps should review one
  12. Is it a special edition which has is limited to a certain amount of boards?
  13. Performance product = Time x MHz ; gives an approx. view on how well-tweaked a certain run is. Read this, PP maths in there: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=168567
  14. Using 3DMark as a CPU test? 3DMark was not build as a cpu benchmark, but as a gpu benchmark, so I'd rather find another benchmark to add to the suite
  15. You have to attach an external screen to your laptop. That's how I benched my 8600M GT
  16. All scores were run on 1280x800, while the standard resolution is 1280x1024. You need to use the standard resolution to have a valid benchmark.
  17. Was talking to RomanLV, not you
  18. C'mon, that's not even a serious remark. HWBot is not about painting and cheating at all and you know that.
  19. 95% of the deleted results were deleted because of the glitches mentioned before (Vistamize/dual monitor setup) and that leaves us with 10-20 results which are strange, most of the results are with the same processor, so about 3-4, maybe 5 different processor glitches. 20 issues on 1200 results is ~ 1,67%, which is not significant enough to instantly ban someone. Anyway, we're talking this through again, taking every opinion/fact into account and will have a solution as soon as possible.
  20. Last sentence was (the one I editted ).
  21. And this one: I say it's a 1700+: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=991&thumb=false
  22. Gradus: so this one is painted as well?: http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=13649&thumb=false (AMD Athlon without 'XP')
×
×
  • Create New...