aerotracks
-
Posts
858 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by aerotracks
-
So far clock advantage of single sided MFR is stronger than performance advantage of these dual rank sticks. I did some testing in XTU as well, but the results aren't worth writing home about
-
Some 5G 32M testing with DS MFR... so you don't have to 3000C11 - 6:01:984 3100C12 6:01:953 3200C13 6:01:734 3270C14 6:01:719 3333C15 6:01:578 No further scaling with C16
-
nfszocker - Core i5 6600K @ 6180MHz - 1780 marks XTU
aerotracks replied to Dancop's topic in Result Discussions
Nice;) -
Wow, Nice work!
-
XTU "max out" with AIO watercooling, CPU-Z was 4904MHz Gave the Sammies a little rest & revisited my old 2200C7 PIS
-
Hey bass, let me keep you busy (a little) 6700k, all custom water L519B743 - R15 4.8 1.375V L519B740 - R15 4.7 1.35V L535B206 #1 - VID 1.232V / XTU 4.9 1.45V / 5G boot 1.44V L535B206 #2 - VID 1.168V / R15 5.0 1.45V / post delid: XTU 5.0 1.45V / 5G boot 1.33V / dead L535B172 - VID 1.200V / R15 4.9 1.375V / 5G boot 1.39V
-
Hey not so fast Mr. websmile the thing died at stock settings Patriots look like nice mems!
-
Has anyone gotten hands on a recent batch of Kingstons with the new A-Die already? Old MFR as fast as they could go on air, half second short of 6min unfortunately. This was from a little back when that 6700k of mine was still working
-
First clue: I got off the subway at Jungfernheide yesterday Tried it on a little Pentium tonight, tool works like a charm ofc
-
aerotracks - Core i3 6320 @ 4000MHz - 739 marks XTU
aerotracks replied to BenchBros's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks guys -
Nice results bull
-
#1!
-
nfszocker - Core i5 6600K @ 6060MHz - 1756 marks XTU
aerotracks replied to 12's topic in Result Discussions
Well deserved GOLD!!! Great work! -
Please tell how it works. With more Memory clock XTU gets faster again, 1213 marks and still more than 30MHz away from 4500
-
Strange, just double checked and working. Page 15, Post #144
-
You can find these on tweak town: http://forums.tweaktown.com/gigabyte/28441-gigabyte-latest-beta-bios-post275773.html#post275773
-
Thanks man, will check that out. I've been having the worst issues with the board tonight. BCLK clocking was gone. Code 8 - power off - overclocking failed even at 100.08 BLCK, with both first and backup bios. Battery out and back in, re-entering Windows XP as well as Win10 "management engine" was recognized as new device. Of all bugs I've seen, this one is ranking pretty high in the category of strange @Lays: I wouldn't worry about XTU, relaxed RTL seem to kill any MHz gains at least on my crappy OS
-
Has anyone tried X04 BIOS + G3258 + Win10 32? It won't load, I'm stuck at the splash screen. With a 4790k Win10 loads without issues. I then switched to F1 version, G3258+Win10 is okay there, but no RTL control.
-
At 2.15V there should be another 250mV head room if my math is not off - 2.4V is max you can set
-
100% awesome!
-
Yep, XMP is 2666 10-12-12
-
Did some testing today on RTL/IO-L behavior with rising clock rates on Samsung, plus stable timings: 1448MHz 9-12-12 RTL 41-42-4-4 1466MHz 9-12-12 RTL 42-43-5-5 (41-42-4-4 trains but unstable, 42-43-4-4 fails with code 69/71) 1498MHz 9-13-13 RTL 42-43-5-5 (42-43-4-4 fails with code 69/71) 1535MHz 9-13-13 RTL 42-43-4-4 (took a while to get to IO-L 4 again!) 42-43-4-4 stops failing at 1520MHz, at 1525 Winboot starts being possible, at 1535MHz 32M will pass. Last stop, 1539Mhz 9-13-13 RTL 43-44-5-5 New 'setup' , Corsair H110 with Fusion pot taking care of mounting pressure
-
Nice!
-
Like I remember now what you told me one year ago tRP 8 at 2800 doesn't work either, performance up there is crap anyhow @bass: yes, that plus the fact that my first OCF was a cranky board which at times wouldn't even post 2600C8
-
Looks like I found the these sticks' dirty little secret why 2720 8-12-8-28 1T TRFC 88 never passed various 3d physics tests
