TerraRaptor

Until the appearance of the tool that would help moderators to detect cpu sharing that idea shouldn't be implemented, imho. That would be the moment some ppl follow the rule and lose team points while others violate it and give a good boost to team.

Bug in Nature. You'd better delete this result.

awesome!

http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=3&cpu=Core+i5+430M&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=&filterUser=&filterVerification=&imageAttached=&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=2130&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0 Here we can see the bug: 1. Clicking on lizardking78's SuperPi score I get his result is 1st out of 4. 2. Clicking on SArd's SuperPi score I get his result is 2nd out of 5. 3. Clicking on johnksss's SuperPi score I get his result is 3rd out of 15. the problem is with the "out of xxx". Each place shows me different number of submitted results in category.

Grats)

Wooot)))

No restricted sharing there for sure. If you have any evidence of sharing then start a thread.

what disks where used?

Great!

Another very good cpu-z submission from guru. Congrats!

Good job

Nice result)

What MoBo mods where used?

Antinomy is right. But in my opinion priority is not a big matter - the more important thing is to get those threads to calculate math simultaneously. In my case there were a lot of times when 1 thread was calculated a bit faster than others - and that made 1 core idle when 3 others were only 96% complete.

Not sure, but on P55 Seven performed better than XP for me. Seems like OS choice is overclocker-dependent.

Grats, Maj0r!

Check this - there are too many cups for this mobile cpu: http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=15&cpu=Core+2+P8400+%282.26Ghz%29&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&memManufacturer=&memType=&memProduct=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minMemFreq=&maxMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&filterBlocked=true&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1729&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&memManufacturerId=&memProductId=&memTypeId=&offset=0

Perfect result for single channel chipset.

Just 'cause of "april fools" - is integrated notebook graphics allowed? I have Gateway laptop with M9800GTS and graphics is integrated there - no MXM or something like that)))

I have found some discrepancies in calculations. Here is my teammates' scores schedule (642.4 boints in total): And here is team profile(639 boints only): Checked that for two days and that difference is still present.

Speedfan and RivaTuner?

The best you can do is to try yourself if it would overclock with another drivers. When using Dell 2400Pro, I had to use 2 utilities at the same time to overclock over 850MHz (known as "black screen problem") - firstly to set clocks with ATT (no change at clocks - utility seemed not to work) and then set the same clocks via AMD Gpu clock tool (changes were applied in case you set the same settings as you did in ATT. If you set any other clocks - there was black screen). Using these utilities without each other gave me only the abscence of overclock or bugs. And only that combining worked best for me.

Just play with different utilities - in most cases GPUTool CTP1 from techpowerup.com works best for me under XP.

I was born in USSR too) Thanks, friend)

Got it, thanks. NickShih, sorry for reporting your submission - just found the thread of crustytheclown here in forums.