TerraRaptor

Spi 1.6 from techpowerup!? Is it allowed?

Happy Birthday!

That is a kinda monster))

hipro5 5s back) So 25th February is going to be not only my birthday?)

Just tried pcmark05 on Win7 x64 yesterday - everything works and works very good - i have better result in W7, not WXP. Problems with single tests are caused by your "services optimization", just try to enable them to check if that was a reason. Good luck!

try different version of wm9encoder - i tried 2 versions to find one working. But that was with XP. Try this link: http://li.ru/go?www.3dnews.ru/files/pub/bench/WM9Encoder.exe.

good for dice)

Russia go-go-go!) Great job, GraduS!

Your score is 306 actually - this is the benchmark of whose base clock (i.e. FSB, BCLK, HT, etc) would be higher.

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&cpu=&numberOfProcessors=0&gpu=GeForce+7900+GTX&numberOfVideocards=1&manufacturer=&chipset=&model=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&countryId=0&teamId=0&userName=&minScore=&maxScore=&displayAdvanced=false&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&system=&minTotalPoints=&gpuId=741&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0 - no gold cup owner.

don't see the owner of gold cup also. Bug?

No, last version says the same 128bit: http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/10/01/09/g8a.png Hm, where is the truth? Please don't add this card until i find out what card this exactly is.

'd check that tomorrow and would post here. As for now, I got 782 3DMarks'03 at 310/420 - way too low for these clocks if it was 64 bit. But tomorrow I'll check that.

As far as I'm unable to spend much for WRs in nearest future, I won't envy they can - even money they put in hobby are worth of this bonus. I like others to take dizzy heights - that is cool!) Hope me to be one of them. I think guys from top-50/100 should speak on this adjustment.

That is bonus. It would be added to general hwpoints. It is just a reason to get higher.

Sounds good, imho. That makes sense to bench top CF and SLI for WRs. And as far as 01 & AM are mostly cpu dependant in case of hi-end gpus, that would suit as single GPU benchers, so multi GPU fans in case of 03/05/06 and Vantage. I.e. you can get your bonus using single GPU, so you can get your bonus in case of CFX.

R.i.p. ((

Ticket ID: 751 Priority: Low I found this card:\r\n\r\nAlthough GPU-Z says it is 128bit, in fact RT is right and results say so too.

Great result!

Well, this tweak is easily noticed - the balance between SM2.0 and SM3.0 changes after D-PP cheat.

Give sample of those bugs in CPU-Z to explain the situation better, Foxtrot.

1.63 is necessary to submit validations saved under 1.55 AFAIK. So it would be just a submission tool, not benchmark one.

Oops, sorry, Andre! I found out it is display resolution there and it doesn't influence performance issues. Congrats!

What's on with the resolution? It is 1680*1050 instead of normal 1024*768 - not default run, in fact.

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641935 - no cpu-z, gpu-z screens. Too high score for such clocks.