Everything posted by Rauf
- AKM - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2205/1444MHz - 441167 marks 3DMark03
-
[FS] 3x12900K 5.3GHz R20
All sold, thanks for space.
-
[FS] 3x12900K 5.3GHz R20
Last chance on last 5.3 chip. Will be sold on swedish market tomorrow!
-
[FS] 3x12900K 5.3GHz R20
Need the 2 good tray chips gone. 5.3 R20 for less than random new one... 600€ shipped within EU.
- CrKos - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2265/1345MHz - 17178 points Unigine Superposition - 1080P Xtreme
-
AKM - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1454/2055MHz - 337268 marks 3DMark03
Work that USB :)
- Alex@ro - Core i9 11900K @ 7150MHz - 3min 37sec 625ms SuperPi - 32M
-
[FS] 3x12900K 5.3GHz R20
Retail sold. Price drop on the two tray chips. 650€ shipped eu Also has one slightly worse tray, 5.2ghz. 550€ shipped eu
-
[FS] 3x12900K 5.3GHz R20
3x 12900K that are quite a bit better than average retails. 2x tray chips (X batch) and one retail KF (V batch). All do R20 at 5.3GHz between 1.26 to 1.28V die sense. Price: 700€ shipped within EU paypal or bank transfer, buyer pays paypal fees
- 1whiteshark1 - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 2075.6/1752.8MHz - 13sec 340ms GPUPI - 1B
- Crazzzy85 - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 1190/1753MHz - 239874 marks 3DMark2001 SE
- 1whiteshark1 - GeForce GTX 980 Ti @ 2075.6/1752.8MHz - 13sec 340ms GPUPI - 1B
- shar00750 - Core i5 12600KF (6P) @ 6752.3MHz - 8136 cb Cinebench - R20
-
snakeeyes - Radeon RX 6900 XT @ 2964/2420MHz - 26918 marks 3DMark - Time Spy
@snakeeyes @Leeghoofd Guys at hardwareluxx have been doing a really great job getting the most out of these cards. But there is also some discussion about something that is not quite right, see last post here: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/radeon-rx-6000-3dmark-time-spy-rangliste.1294520/page-52#post-28804684 I don't know what is going on really, would be great if anyone from HWL could clarify.
- safedisk - Core i9 12900K (8P) @ 7330MHz - 3min 36sec 841ms SuperPi - 32M
- safedisk - Core i9 12900K (8P) @ 7358MHz - 3min 37sec 312ms SuperPi - 32M
- Rauf - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2820/1388MHz - 460260 marks 3DMark03
- Rauf - Radeon RX 6900 XT @ 3000/2350MHz - 60860 marks 3DMark - Fire Strike
-
HWBOT 2020 Make it great again Thread:
I think I have mentioned it before, but I like the idea of just making the rankings % of top score. First place is 100%, and then every following score just gets the percentage of the top score. It's extremely simple to code and you never have to recalculate entire rankings, except when a new top score is posted. Should make for a much lower server load. You can also reduce your opponents points by uploading a better top score. For the unpopular rankings there could be dividers, like 75% if less than 100 subs, 50% if less than 50 etc. HW points could also be handled by dividers it you want globals to be worth more like it is today. Top score on HW points would be 100 divided by 2 for example. And then also add additional divider if less than X subs.
-
HWBOT 2020 Make it great again Thread:
I think this is way better than the current system. The current where you go from 150 for first place to 75 for third is just absurd. What will the scaling be for hw points? Can't give high hw points for rankings without a decent amount of subs...
- Rauf - Radeon RX 6900 XT @ 2900/2140MHz - 73800 marks 3DMark11 - Performance
-
A new way to address CPUs (Cores/Threads) on HWBot
Maybe wait for something official, so far it's only a database entry... And please stop with the Intel marketing nonsense. It's just ridiculous that they would care to influence hwbot. In the past Pieter tried to please everyone here on the forum, and still got nothing but shit for it. And no one was happy with what came out of it. I only hope current administration has a strong plan for the future and stick to it.
- MetalRacer - Ryzen 5 5600X @ 5702MHz - 20.288 fps HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k
- P5ych0 - Core i9 11900K @ 7174MHz - 3min 37sec 734ms SuperPi - 32M
- Rauf - GeForce RTX 3090 @ 2880/1388MHz - 19322 marks 3DMark - Port Royal