Rauf

Retail sold. Price drop on the two tray chips. 650€ shipped eu Also has one slightly worse tray, 5.2ghz. 550€ shipped eu

3x 12900K that are quite a bit better than average retails. 2x tray chips (X batch) and one retail KF (V batch). All do R20 at 5.3GHz between 1.26 to 1.28V die sense. Price: 700€ shipped within EU paypal or bank transfer, buyer pays paypal fees

Yes, cs with "new" drivers. Anything newer than 37X or 38X has cs

Nice, never got 01 running on Asus boards the last two gens...

Cuda 11 FTW :) but let's see what my USB can bring...

Wow, very strong!

@snakeeyes @Leeghoofd Guys at hardwareluxx have been doing a really great job getting the most out of these cards. But there is also some discussion about something that is not quite right, see last post here: https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/radeon-rx-6000-3dmark-time-spy-rangliste.1294520/page-52#post-28804684 I don't know what is going on really, would be great if anyone from HWL could clarify.

Great score!

Cool!

Thanks!

Fixed

I think I have mentioned it before, but I like the idea of just making the rankings % of top score. First place is 100%, and then every following score just gets the percentage of the top score. It's extremely simple to code and you never have to recalculate entire rankings, except when a new top score is posted. Should make for a much lower server load. You can also reduce your opponents points by uploading a better top score. For the unpopular rankings there could be dividers, like 75% if less than 100 subs, 50% if less than 50 etc. HW points could also be handled by dividers it you want globals to be worth more like it is today. Top score on HW points would be 100 divided by 2 for example. And then also add additional divider if less than X subs.

I think this is way better than the current system. The current where you go from 150 for first place to 75 for third is just absurd. What will the scaling be for hw points? Can't give high hw points for rankings without a decent amount of subs...

Nope, error in submission. Fixed now.

Maybe wait for something official, so far it's only a database entry... And please stop with the Intel marketing nonsense. It's just ridiculous that they would care to influence hwbot. In the past Pieter tried to please everyone here on the forum, and still got nothing but shit for it. And no one was happy with what came out of it. I only hope current administration has a strong plan for the future and stick to it.

Nice!

Wow, crazy chip!

Thanks!

3D01 does not work on XP with asus. Hangs on load screen...

Nice chip, now let's see 32M!

Always conspiracy theories here... I'm sure hwbot points are extremely important to intel... Big.little makes so much sense from a practical point of view. First generation with something new is not always super, we'll just have to wait and see. but I'm sure this is the future. So we can either stick our heads in the sand and compare performance in an irrelevant way, or adapt to something that makes sense. For now I think the best way would be to create all new categories, like 8+8, 6+6 or something. Then see how everything goes and make a bigger overhaul when there are more facts and there is time for development.

@CENSLoad temps improved by somewhere around 4-6C. It is now about as good as my modded bitspower pot, but very fast to cool down. But I had higher hopes actually for load temps. Let's see what the future brings.

Most of the proposals feature massively increased numbers of CPU rankings. Some also mean you can use a single golden cpu for multiple rankings, saturating your profile points-wise with mostly one good chip. Meanwhile we have one single GPU-ranking... (considering SLI is more or less dead) I have always liked the idea of dividing into low-, mid-, high- and ultrahigh end. For both CPUs and GPUs. It's possible CPUs would require more categories, but you get the idea. That way the global points can always stay relevant and don't have to introduce strange categories that in one way or another won't be fair. Sure it means alot of work for the old CPUs, dividing them into categories. But the alternative would be to have possible hundreds of CPU-rankings in the near future. One big benefit is for the GPU-rankings also. It would mean that you could compete for globals without being rich or have good sponsors as you could bench for globals in the lower ranges.

I think this screenshot should be a little better. And here is the screen of the faster run that crashed. These were run at 100.0 bclk i believe...

Can extreme guys play? With ambient cooling ofc...