Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've just tested a freshly compiled 64 bit version of GPUPI 2.1 and it's as fast as GPUPI 1.2 Beta. I will include it in the release! :)

Posted
You dont lol.

 

:mad:

 

I've just tested a freshly compiled 64 bit version of GPUPI 2.1 and it's as fast as GPUPI 1.2 Beta. I will include it in the release! :)

 

:);)

Posted
You dont lol.

 

With OpenCL for Intel CPU , yes , it works perfectly ... run run run GPU PI 2.0 for CPU on Nvidia card system .... :banana:

Guest TheMadDutchDude
Posted

Yeah, I can see that happening too. You can't do a run on the GPU and submit under the CPU category because you have an Intel CPU.

Posted

Yes , the test only work for me know last week and not read all bench technics ...

 

Its normal from beginners ...

Posted

GPUPI_GT200.exe (compiled with CUDA toolkit 6.5 for CUDA 2.0 support of Geforce 200 series cards)

 

 

whil tis include all geforce 200 series card or only the gtx?

gts 250 not suportred by the curent version

Guest TheMadDutchDude
Posted

As it is throwing up an invalid result whilst being overclocked, the overclock isn't stable enough.

 

Of course overclocking is allowed, that's what HWBOT is all about! :D

Posted
screenshot

Its allowed.

But if its not a stable overclock for this bench, then the run will fail.

 

Its same as the "Not in Round error" people get on Super Pi when pushing memory.

 

Lower the frequency a little bit & it will pass. Sometimes you get lucky & are able to get the bench pass at a frequency that was previously unstable.

Posted
Anything i can check for when running gpu 1b test?

Sometimes it is valid, other times it finishes but reports invalid. Same settings on my end.

 

Watch your GPU temps. I just finished benching another round of 1B with my R9 290X and if my temp went above a certain temperature before the test finished I'd get an invalid result. I wait for the GPU to drop down to around 36C before I run 1B because it finishes before the GPU gets above 65C and bellow that temp 1203/1634 is stable but above that it starts making calculation errors.

 

BTW what's the policy on using different GPUs in parallel? because I have 260X and HD 5850 available for use.

Posted
BTW what's the policy on using different GPUs in parallel? because I have 260X and HD 5850 available for use.

 

You can combine any two cards, the result will be ranked in the stronger card category.

For example if you run

290X & 7970, the result will be counted as 2 290Xs.

Posted

I thought you had an Algorithm for that.?

Didn't know that wasn't the case.

 

Or we can leave it for the user & hope that the cheated results get reported, shaky but these are the only 2 options I can see.

Posted

Actually I can see, how the first case wouldn't work.

 

A simple algo would pick the newer card as the faster one & rank the results accordingly.

 

 

But what if someone ran a 7970 & a 260.

 

The 260 is newer, so the algo would rank the results as 2 x 260, but the 7970 is actually faster.

Hmnn.

Posted

The super asymmetrical setups (260 with a 6970 for example) could just all be ranked by the number of GPUs used and not eligible for hardware points. I just want to use the R9 290X + R7 260X + 5850 setup because I want to get global points I don't care about hardware points with a setup as bizarre as that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...