mariosalice Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 HEY !!! As far as I know (and have said) lending and renting hardware is illegal on HWBOT. Why are you guys trying to bend the rules? It seems to me that everyone understands the rule besides HOT? Why??? Lending/renting hardware is not allowed. Did you lend E. or G. your VGA, yes or no? I can't make this even more simple guys. Even the situation with Unseen is clear as water: he gets the cpu from a magazine to write a review => he's allowed to post results. Hipro gets a cpu from intel => he's allowed to post results. 18 pages of ramblings .... As I said not even your moderators know the ownership rules. And I think this time you changed them again. As far as I know (and have said) lending and renting hardware is illegal on HWBOT. Though richba5tard (Administrator) said on post No 2 (not yet a rule thought, just a suggestion). - only the owner of the processor may submit scores in processor related benches- only the owner of the videocard may submit scores in videocard related benches Which is the same with the august 07 suggestion for joint sessions. No ownership rules applied in August 07 for benching alone though. This is new. (Remember how you defined subteams and joint sessions). The august 07 revision about joint sessions is this: - For videocard benchmarks (3DMark01/03/05/06, Aquamark): upload the results to the account of the owner of the videocard.- For processor benchmarks (SuperPi1M/32M, PCMark05, wPrime32M/1024M, PiFast): upload the results to the account of the owner of the processor. - Uploading lower scores on other accounts than the one of owner of the hardware is not allowed. You personaly and recently put new rules on post No 151 Though on your quoted post you changed them again. You suggest that not only the manufacturer but also a magazine can give a CPU for benching to more than one overclockers as long as they are on different teams. Compare this - post results with hardware you have for review, send by the manufacturer himself with this one Even the situation with Unseen is clear as water: he gets the cpu from a magazine to write a review => he's allowed to post results. So who is trying to bend the rules? We want to know the rules and play fair. You don't.
darthtony Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 @Gorillakos I am new to the team(age 14) but I totally agree with you. I can't understand why there is sooooooo much hate between the Hot-OOS ! But i think if most of the people support the idea for changing the name and have a unique team he wouldn't be so negative. +9999999999999999999999999999999 sould we start a vote?
AN7 OverClocker Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 @GoriLLakoS You know that i love you :p ... i think that am just too fanatic and the most times i am over reacting and pushing it to the limits. I dont want to believe that i'm crazy
mariosalice Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 I think that the wonership rule is a bit sly. How can you give hwboints to those who bench with hardware send by a manufacturer, a magazine or a store and restrict the rest from sharing their hardware? Nothing changes even if you sticked to your original rule. "post results with hardware you have for review, send by the manufacturer himself" Getting hwboints from hardware sent by the manyfacturer for reviewing is unacceptable anyway, with or without the ownership rule.
Massman Posted January 11, 2008 Posted January 11, 2008 I think that the wonership rule is a bit sly. How can you give hwboints to those who bench with hardware send by a manufacturer, a magazine or a store and restrict the rest from sharing their hardware? Nothing changes even if you sticked to your original rule. "post results with hardware you have for review, send by the manufacturer himself" Getting hwboints from hardware sent by the manyfacturer for reviewing is unacceptable anyway, with or without the ownership rule. Rules are not waterproof - we know that already . Last line I disagree (and many of us, I think). Think this thread has been going on a bit too long, I'll close this one and let George/Bill know what the final verdict is. We will take everything into account and will find the best solution. To continue the discussion about hardware sharing => http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?p=14907#post14907 <=
Recommended Posts