Posted August 26, 20168 yr Administrators After season 1 and 2 of the Old school is best school series were a full success Hwbot plans to make a third season to once again give retro hardware lovers and tweakers the chance to compete at highest level. Because of this we search a competition manager for this task. After Antinomy and Lanbonden did tremendous jobs at designing the structure and stages of season 1 and 2, we now want you to do the job for season 3 These are the main tasks for old school is best school season 3 - come up with a theme (for artwork) - come up with competition structure - come up with competition stages It does not have to be all done by one person alone necessarily. If there is structure people agree on or competition manager determines, prominent old-school participants of first two seasons might plan different competition stages to enter their know how and experience for example. Feedback is welcome, volunteers of course as well - preferably we would want the Old school is best school participants to manage this in a way they enjoy the third season as much as possible
August 26, 20168 yr Author Administrators I think it will be enough time, the old school 3 will for sure not start before october, maybe later - so you have at least 4-5 weeks to get all you need to organize it
August 27, 20168 yr Round-1: s771 (771 to 775 mod allowed)/Quadro G96 core or older Single GPU only Stage-1: Maxmem Read BandWidth Stage-2: 3D06 Stage-3: Vantage Round-2 All S939 (Opterons allowed)/GF7 (multi GPU allowed) Stage-1 Cine bench 11.5 (divided by core count) Stage-2 Ice Storm Stage-3 Realbench Round-3 s478/Matrox Stage-1 Wprime 1024 Stage-2 3D03 Stage-3 PCM04 Round-4 s462/GF2 stage-1 CPU Frequency (Percentage of OC) Stage-2 3D01 Stage-3 Cine Bench 03 Round-5 Slot 1/Slot A/s7 //Rage Stage-1 Slot 1 and Rage 3DMark 99 Stage-2 Slot A SPI 1m Stage-3 Socket-7 HWBprime Multi-Socket allowed where applicable. Edited August 29, 20168 yr by mr.paco
August 28, 20168 yr Author Administrators Looks good, you got PM regarding two points, apart from this I am very happy with the build up
August 28, 20168 yr Any other option (becides Matrox) for round 3 ? Nope. That's the difficulty factor for that round.
August 28, 20168 yr Looks interesting. Round 1 is the hardest for me... as I don't have a single pci-e quadro
August 28, 20168 yr Author Administrators I sent Frank a PM, we need to make a few adjustments like limit age of quadros, there are modern M5000s iirc for 10k we all do not want to see, but he did an awesome job so far
August 28, 20168 yr I sent Frank a PM, we need to make a few adjustments like limit age of quadros, there are modern M5000s iirc for 10k we all do not want to see, but he did an awesome job so far I will make the needed adjustments shortly.
August 28, 20168 yr Looks interesting. Round 1 is the hardest for me... as I don't have a single pci-e quadro I don't either.
August 28, 20168 yr Looks good, you got PM regarding two points, apart from this I am very happy with the build up Has been update. Let me know how it looks now.
August 29, 20168 yr Why don't we make round 4 even more interesting? In stage 1 there is 1, maybe 2 CPU models to be used, let's narrow it to Thunderbird or Palomino core to make it more difficult Cinebench will be dominated by dual Athlon MP (or modded XP), so maybe result can be divided by number of cores? And for 2001... maybe a clock limit of 2500?
August 29, 20168 yr Why don't we make round 4 even more interesting? In stage 1 there is 1, maybe 2 CPU models to be used, let's narrow it to Thunderbird or Palomino core to make it more difficult Cinebench will be dominated by dual Athlon MP (or modded XP), so maybe result can be divided by number of cores? And for 2001... maybe a clock limit of 2500? Realistically.....you only have 3 choices for stage 1. Find one. If you divide by core in stage 2 there is no point in a dual socket board. Stage 3.......I kinda like the clock limit idea. Ask Frank. It's his show.
August 29, 20168 yr Realistically.....you only have 3 choices for stage 1. Find one.If you divide by core in stage 2 there is no point in a dual socket board. Stage 3.......I kinda like the clock limit idea. Ask Frank. It's his show. Can you send me by PM the third one? I suspect it's the same core as two most obvious, but I thought I'd ask.
August 29, 20168 yr Can you send me by PM the third one? I suspect it's the same core as two most obvious, but I thought I'd ask. Certainly.
August 29, 20168 yr Author Administrators Has been update.Let me know how it looks now. How about limiting the quadros by Core? I would propose G96 or older, it will be easier for me and participants plus you have dx10 for vantage from g80 upwards. http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocards#key=nvidia_quadro_series Generally, you did a very good and fast job, I am looking forward to round 3
August 29, 20168 yr Why don't we make round 4 even more interesting? In stage 1 there is 1, maybe 2 CPU models to be used, let's narrow it to Thunderbird or Palomino core to make it more difficult Cinebench will be dominated by dual Athlon MP (or modded XP), so maybe result can be divided by number of cores? And for 2001... maybe a clock limit of 2500? I tryed to put it together to allow for as many participants as possible with out having too many limitations or making too easy. I only submitted my idea, it will have to be up to WebSmiles to change anything he deems necessary.
August 29, 20168 yr Author Administrators For me the stages and hardware choice are very good, apart from the simplification at quadros I see no reason to change your concept, Frank. If we make things too complicated, we scare new guys of, and this is why I like your clear choice of benchmarks and hardware.
August 29, 20168 yr How about limiting the quadros by Core? I would propose G96 or older, it will be easier for me and participants plus you have dx10 for vantage from g80 upwards. Overclocking, overclocking, and much more! Like overclocking. Generally, you did a very good and fast job, I am looking forward to round 3 No problem; Will make Quadros G96 or older. I wanted to have it up as soon as I could to be able to get all questions/concerns/complaints out of the way so that once it starts there are no hick-ups/problems . At least that was my thinking I hope its well accepted by everyone. Thank you for the opportunity... Edited August 29, 20168 yr by mr.paco
August 30, 20168 yr Helloy gues. My opinion for next old cup with popular hardware. Round-1 S939/GF7 (multi GPU allowed) Stage-1 Cine bench 11.5 (divided by core count) Stage-2 3D11 Stage-3 Realbench Round-2 s478/Matrox Stage-1 HWBprime Stage-2 3D06 Stage-3 PCM04 Round-3 s462 with sdr sdram/GF2 stage-1 CPU Frequency cpu fsb 133 Stage-2 3D01 Stage-3 Cine Bench 03 Round-4 s370/FX5200 stage-1 SPI 1M Celeron 66fsb Stage-2 Wprime 1024 pentium 100fsb (dual socket alowed) Stage-3 AM3 Round-5 slot1/s7/ Ati Rage stage-1 slot1 Cpu Frequency (percentage of OC) Stage-2 S7 Pifast Stage-3 3D99
August 30, 20168 yr Looks awesome Frank mate. Damn now a 939 board with 4 pice lanes next to each other. Lol.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.