Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

could use some more multi gpu, maybe fermi sli?

might be fun to have some terascale gpus in there as well

hedt (x58, x79, x99, x299) single core stuff (32m, pyprime) might be interesting especially since you can't disable cores

some more legacy gpu stuff would get my vote as well, maybe clock limited 03

most of the am4 suggestions sound good but I especially like ref frequency, and zen 1 3dm11 physics

Edited by exaberries
forgot multi gpu suggestion
  • Like 1
Posted
Quote

Am4 max ref clk

true ref. clock, or cpu ref clock?

If true ref., sounds bad, we have no way to distinguish it from cpu ref clock (cpuz shows cpu ref clock on AM4) and we will see a lot of 120mhz results, once everybody figures it out.
If cpu ref clock, boards with external bclk AND ref. clock target switch (for example, crosshair 6 and 7) will dominate the stage, which also doesn't sound great.

Posted
35 minutes ago, denvys5 said:

true ref. clock, or cpu ref clock?

If true ref., sounds bad, we have no way to distinguish it from cpu ref clock (cpuz shows cpu ref clock on AM4) and we will see a lot of 120mhz results, once everybody figures it out.
If cpu ref clock, boards with external bclk AND ref. clock target switch (for example, crosshair 6 and 7) will dominate the stage, which also doesn't sound great.

W8 they're not linked? And I think we'd do it by chipset so at least c8 would be out cause x570 sux

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

W8 they're not linked?

They are linked. On most boards. But, there are exceptions:

  1. Crosshair X370
  2. Crosshair X470

Those boards have a feature to unlink bclk from cpu ref. clock and clock them separately. Cpuz registers one tied to cpu. 

It is easy to check manually in cpuz valid, attention to memory clock.

 

25 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

And I think we'd do it by chipset so at least c8 would be out cause x570 sux

120mhz should be doable on most boards, with unlocked specific bios options (to disable the chipset :D ), so the only other option become boards with external bclk that do not have 120mhz limit (no idea which would fit here, C8 maybe? giga x470?)

Edited by denvys5
Posted (edited)
Quote

Am4 cpu valid

If no restrictions, not a lot of diversity, 6gig ln2 all subs (and 5g+- ambient)

If split into specific generations, it may become interesting.

 

Edited by denvys5
Posted

Looking forward towards the 2022 CC

Id love to see this moved to DEC-JAN. Some people get more time off work during this period...Plus its colder here in Canadaland :)

 

Thanks to all who moderate and participate!!

  • Like 1
Posted

We've voted on this before, stays Nov Dec. But we could always do another poll, ultimate decision is up to Alby. Either way we should suggest as many stages as we can think of that we'd want otherwise we have no right to complain about bad stages after comp start. 

Posted

posting this here as well as in the discord

more stage suggestions:

  • gts 450 3dm 03
  • fermi firestrike, socket 1150 only, no gpu count restriction
  • superposition on some older gpu gen
  • 3dm 11 extreme terascale gpus
  • x265 4k per core, by socket (1366, 2011-1, 2011-3, 2066), probably no kbl-x for 2066
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

can we have a stage for new gpus now that they are available again. ive got all these gpus sitting here not mining. why not have a 8x 3090 gpu pi stage 

Edited by Jumper118
  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, ProKoN said:

Looking forward towards the 2022 CC

Id love to see this moved to DEC-JAN. Some people get more time off work during this period.

agree. end of year is always busy at work whereas jan is dead and much easier to get time off. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I like the kepler stage, maybe 8 core instead of 6 core? opens up a few more options

maybe narrow the crossfire to just 3000-6000 so its just terascale no gcn 

and like I said in the discord channel:

32m per intel hedt socket (1366?, 2011-1, 2011-3, 2066) (no kblx)

zen 1 (am4 only) 3dmark 11 physics (per core?)

  • Like 1
  • Crew
Posted (edited)

Last year someone (unity?) proposed a Skylake farewell stage, like SuperPI 32M for Core i generations 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 and I liked that idea.

Or Geekbench (3/4?) Multi Core Intel 4- (or 6-)core CPUs with different sockets.

Or Cinebench R20 AM4 Zen 1, 2, 3 & AM5 Zen 4 8-core CPUs

Also 3DMark Port Royal or even the new Speed Way?

Edited by Don_Dan
Posted

I agree that the crossfire stage should be narrowed down to terascale, so 3000-6000 series. 

I also think it would be fun to do a benchmark for FM2/+ that would use the IGPU as well as the CPU. Something like vantage performance would be fun. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...