SArd Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 It is Pentium M 370 Celeron http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588770 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588771 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onni Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669935 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669922 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669892 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669911 Its not radeon 1650 ddr2 scores,its 1650 ddr3 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670212 gpu info missing?cpuz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=564835 project isn't valid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nazar Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Hi Maxi, You blocked my result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663999 ORB now working, put it back pls :-) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9295361 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 Hi Maxi,You blocked my result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663999 ORB now working, put it back pls :-) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9295361 Checked it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=669292 - 8800GT in 7300GT category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667105 - 2900pro in 7300GT category And I reming about that scores on 7600GS: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634426 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617130 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670593 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=624332 It's impossible on single card without using Low MIP Textures tweak/cheat. Same thing with Damikor scores on 7600GT: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670584 - 860 fps wings of fury!? 100% Low MIP Textures. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670585 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670586 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670587 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Yes, me and my friend Sector19 used Low MIP texture tweak. It's tweak, but this tweak not allowed by hwbot. Please check this thread: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=1007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sector19 Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Yes, me and my friend Sector19 used Low MIP texture tweak. LOL I Used Low MIP, but i've made this result long time ago... when no one heard about it... Now i don't have 76Gs to remake tests . SO please dont say that "me and my friend..." because i've told you, that it is not allowed nowadays. Today You can use LOD and with some modifications you can make it to +15. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 And the same thing with 7600GS DDR3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661453 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670586 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661774 How I detect it: I've tested 7600GS DDR3 with and without Low MIP Textures, here is example: 3DMark05 = 9641 (without Low MIP Textures): uploaded here http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572208 3DMark05 = 9968 (with Low MIP Textures): not uploaded on hwbot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670408 - SLI score in single card category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615746 - SLI score in single card category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kim55 Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=669890 - E6400 in T5250 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670168 - GMA 3100 in GMA X3100 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670171 - GMA 3100 in GMA X3100 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670174 - GMA 3100 in GMA X3100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670400 screen doesn't show resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593389 - no cpu proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637948 - no photo,dead FM link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555006 - photo shows 7900GT & FM links shows 7600GS ... and the result is in 7900GTO section ??? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555009 - photo shows 7900GT & FM links shows 7600GS ... and the result is in 7900GTO section ??? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526606 - photo shows spi1M & FM link is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 Checked it Why the rest have not checked up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
password problem Posted December 6, 2007 Share Posted December 6, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667159 That's impossible to do that with this graphic card. Check the GFX score.It's anormally higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655694 project is not valid and no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663867 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted December 7, 2007 Share Posted December 7, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672552 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672543 obviously that is the same rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=655694 project is not valid and no resolution Project link has been reactivited, verified. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=663867 no resolution blocked http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672552http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672543 obviously that is the same rig Blocked http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=667159That's impossible to do that with this graphic card. Check the GFX score.It's anormally higher. Blocked by Maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673022 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673029 Wrong videocard, this is 8800 Ultra and post as 8800GTX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
password problem Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Thx Massman and maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Please fix: 1.) Kindly I remind Originally Posted by klopcha View Post http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ??? If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked. 2.) Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. 3.) Please Fix http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639182 No link, no screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639186 No link, no screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=548479 Result on Ti4200 AGPx8, but category Ti 4200 64MB. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574015 Result on Ti4200 AGPx8, but category Ti 4200 64MB. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668541 Screenshot is not load. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 No resolution. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659161 Result on i855GM, but category i852GM. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=671054 No resolution. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=672148 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662777 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=662777 Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672612 (http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=672613 Copy of this result) Result on Geforce 8500GT, but category Radeon 8500. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587903 No link, no screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610155 Result in 6800GS, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504700 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504745 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507569 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=548308 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=555800 Result in 6800Ultra, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507556 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=398141 No link, no screenshot. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507220 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=507031 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=505120 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=572135 The videocard is not specified. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=651721 Result on 6800 Ultra (PCI-E system), but category 6800 AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=666708 and copies http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668695 and http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668640 Result in 6800GT, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656630 Result on 6800 Ultra, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668675 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642026 The videocard is not specified. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=613557 The videocard is not specified. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668705 Result in 6800GS, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668707 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668673 Result on 6800LE, but category 6800AGP. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=573499 The videocard is not specified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=668541 The result without user, how can it be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted December 8, 2007 Share Posted December 8, 2007 Should all be fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted December 8, 2007 Crew Share Posted December 8, 2007 wow, nice work you're doing massman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts