K404 Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 2 fairly major odd results: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702648 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702949 Both are miles ahead of the 2nd place scores, despite having MUCH lower clocks. (6600GT) Could be SLI results in the single card section?
zavlakas Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 I'm not able to check any screens on Hwbot.orghttp://img114.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sdggggggggggggggggpt3.jpg I've check FF and IE-no difference hmm,realy don't know what is happening :)always when I check thumbnails:mad: Any ideas? Try to open in new tab/window....
71proste Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 I realy wish my friend http://www.fotosik.pl/pokaz_obrazek/pelny/c7d807b92521624b.html I have check few browsers,my friend pc's and same-F@#@#K
demiurg Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing fixed
Narmer Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407 Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505889 Wrong category - AXP Mobile in AXP category
demiurg Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572852http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/539/32m5tf7.jpg SuperPi -> 24min 0sec 910ms in the Pic you can see 24min 29sec 906 Please deactivate This score fixed
demiurg Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702614 - bugged run (479.58 FPS in mother nature @ X1650XT) fixed
Pepek86 Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 wrong category. Should be move to this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1578 Brisbane http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700021 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701885 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693171 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378
71proste Posted February 26, 2008 Posted February 26, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674334 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674269 hmm...
71proste Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696559 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696448 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696002 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696164 wrong pifast http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643993 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670737 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659795 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=683508 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600765 not enough proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600762
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 I'd also like to add some pretty-messed up results : GeForce 6800 GS (NV40) AGP category http://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=911 ALL THE AM3 RESULTS POSTED IN THAT CATEGORY, ARE DONE WITH PCI-E 6800GS VGAs ... I don't know if all these guys are THAT confused, that they can not tell which is the PCI-E and which is the AGP category, but they are in the wrong category ! fixed
George_o/c Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 Thanks a million, demiurg ! But what about that ? ... http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=16137&postcount=1092
Lanc Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 fixed And what about rest of the results reported ?
George_o/c Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 no resolution Holy shit ! This guy's 3D Marks have no resolution AT ALL ... So, that means that he could have faked them all by not using the standard benchmark resolution ? ... And what about rest of the results reported ? I think you 'll have to wait like all of us do ... They have to compete with a huuuuuge amount of results, unfortunately ...
Ivan1981 Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 No resolution.Results are too high for this clocks of the card: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700531 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536 Possible smaller resolution then default. BUMP
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 GeForce 6800 GS (NV42) AGP categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByVideoCard.do?gpuModelId=1268 Well, there is only one guy benching this specific card ... But guess what ? He managed to bench two 6800GS AGP VGAs in SLi ... He's clearly mistaken, it's pretty damn obvious Maybe because, the NV42 core is both in AGP and in PCI-E 6800GSs fixed
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 And what about rest of the results reported ? ASAP I`am working on it
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698366http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698365 wPrime 1.34...... fixed
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665824http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=613395 It's fake or program bug - go to 3rd and next places -> http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=14&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Pentium+3+800Mhz+%28216%29&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=1015&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= fixed
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 2 fairly major odd results: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702648 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702949 Both are miles ahead of the 2nd place scores, despite having MUCH lower clocks. (6600GT) Could be SLI results in the single card section? fixed
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690407Wrong category - Yonah in Northwood category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=505889 Wrong category - AXP Mobile in AXP category fixed
MaSell Posted February 27, 2008 Posted February 27, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941 - wprime 1.53http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938 - wprime 1.53 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 - sli or low resolution
Crew NeoForce Posted February 27, 2008 Crew Posted February 27, 2008 Originally Posted by MaSell http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695914 - sli or low resolution fixed
Crew NeoForce Posted February 27, 2008 Crew Posted February 27, 2008 Originally Posted by MaSell http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696941 - wprime 1.53 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696938 - wprime 1.53 fixed
Recommended Posts