K404 Posted June 13, 2012 Posted June 13, 2012 As title. Taking it nice and easy on multiple chips at 2C/2T. Couldn't get much over 5.9GHz. I have a known good chip and still....5.9GHz boot. I got mad and tried 4C/4T.... and BOOM! straight in at 6.1GHz. WTF?? Quote
Hiwa Posted June 13, 2012 Posted June 13, 2012 (edited) normal man, i tried a chip last week, 1 core 6.4, 2cores 6.5 and 4cores 6.6 lol forget about ait bining need to test direct ln2. we tried 50 retail cpus at computex but we werent lucky, some cpu 47 and 49 and some 50 and 51x, best ln2 cpu was one of the 50s and then one of the 49x ...all 51x were crap. Edited June 13, 2012 by Hiwa Quote
K404 Posted June 13, 2012 Author Posted June 13, 2012 Thanks Hiwa. Nice to know i'm not the only one! My board (UD5H) stops playing nice after a couple hours Every single time. GRRRRRRRR Quote
sin0822 Posted June 13, 2012 Posted June 13, 2012 i think it depends on CPU, some are good with less cores, core better without. Some CPU crap out after half an hour or so, might be due to the thermal paste INtel uses, or perhaps the CPU or something else. Quote
Crew Vivi Posted June 19, 2012 Crew Posted June 19, 2012 same splave.... i've been 2c/2thearding it . Next run im gonna test 1core 2 core 3 core 4 core before i make my judgement Quote
dinos22 Posted June 19, 2012 Posted June 19, 2012 I usually test 2 cores first and most chips tend to max out on that Quote
M.Beier Posted July 6, 2012 Posted July 6, 2012 normal man, i tried a chip last week, 1 core 6.4, 2cores 6.5 and 4cores 6.6 lol forget about ait bining need to test direct ln2. we tried 50 retail cpus at computex but we werent lucky, some cpu 47 and 49 and some 50 and 51x, best ln2 cpu was one of the 50s and then one of the 49x ...all 51x were crap. damn...been binning straight at 2c2t lmao I usually test 2 cores first and most chips tend to max out on that Moral of the story; Splave & Dino will remain n00bs Jokes aside, always test at various settings before ditching stuff, hardware can be strange as hell - 'malfunctioning' multipliers etc.... As for cores I've had the experience that it is also based on board; Extreme6 4c/4t has been best for me (tested with 4 pcs), UD5H 2c/2t // 2c/4t equally good (only tested with 1 pcs so far) Quote
Calathea Posted July 6, 2012 Posted July 6, 2012 I have a chip that is more stable 4 cores than 2. Simply because cores 0/1 is weak and 3/4 stronger. Quote
CL3P20 Posted July 9, 2012 Posted July 9, 2012 I have a chip that is more stable 4 cores than 2. Simply because cores 0/1 is weak and 3/4 stronger. This* Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.