8 Pack - GeForce GTX 680 @ 1960/1959MHz - 59711 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance

[8 Pack]

Cheers Reggie

[K404]

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18475109

 

Are you going to Man up and move to Pro league now?

 

(congrats on the position!)

Edited January 3, 2013 by K404

[Christian Ney]

Score blocked after investigation, this run is bugged (too high fps for the hardware/clocks used in GT2).

Edited January 4, 2013 by Christian Ney

[dhenzjhen]

If he's gonna reproduce same score and post it again are you going to unblock it or still considered a bugged run?

[xxbassplayerxx]

Score is slightly higher than other runs with similar clockspeeds. 8-pack mentions that he used LOD and did a lot of tweaking... Since when is an extremely efficient run bugged?

[Moose83]

Welcome to Hwbot...An normal Overclocker beats Pro Overclockers, must be bugged then lol....Accept, that that was an great run!

[xxbassplayerxx]

GT2 is 5.15% higher than Vince. GPU memory is 3.06% higher and CPU memory is 4% higher. Check Pieter's thread on the forums here, we know LOD tuning with 600 series increases scores by ~8%, if I recall.

 

I can't see how there is nearly enough evidence here to call his run "bugged" and block it... but I'll wait until evidence is presented.

[Christian Ney]

Only one run out of 100 achieving 597xx while all other runs were always around 582xx I don't call it a "normal run"

[xxbassplayerxx]

His score that was just 100 points below Vince's was before LOD which adds ~8% for the GTX 600 series.

[moparman]

Just seems that people can't handle a non pro league beating pro league members. Great job 8pack.

[Christian Ney]

I will test the LOD thingy on monday but i doubt it's because of it according to the informations I received.

[ME4ME]

Only one run out of 100 achieving 597xx while all other runs were always around 582xx I don't call it a "normal run"

 

Not to take any side, don't have the info .. but isn't that exactly what people do in 3dmark01

[SF3D]

Moderators are taking down similar scores everyday in Hwbot. That is normal, when something in some particular score is not correct.

 

Here is one comparison taken from crew section, so you can see yourself:

 

"8pack = 5.64GHz 3930K / 1960MHz/1949MHz VGA (LOD 27)

GT1= 169 (OK)

GT2= 187 (Way too high for the clocks)

 

Andre = 5.7GHz 3970X / 1855MHz/1900 VGA (LOD 27)

GT1 = 174 (OK)

GT2 = 173,78 (OK)"

 

So this case have nothing to do with the 3DM01 Car low test, where you can have different type of runs.

 

Mods will let you people know what is the outcome of this LOD 27 thing later.

[xxbassplayerxx]

What about this one?

 

8pack = 5.64GHz 3930K / 1960MHz/1949MHz VGA (No LOD)

GT1= 170

GT2= 173

[SF3D]

As you can see, that result is on the rankings normally: http://hwbot.org/submission/2340838_

 

That result can be directly compared to results in the previous post and with same LOD 27 setting it is just completely OK.

If that 170fps GT1 would be without LOD it would be bug as well and would be removed.

 

This case is finished and 8pack can continue to hunt top spots just like before

[xxbassplayerxx]

Where can you see that it used LOD? 8pack said he did not use LOD on it.

[Massman]

Welcome to Hwbot...An normal Overclocker beats Pro Overclockers, must be bugged then lol....Accept, that that was an great run!

 

Welcome to HWBOT, where every single decision by the staff is considered fraud, corruption or stupidity by some community members.

 

I have full trust in the (volunteer) moderator team doing their job in the best way they can. Most team members have been around for a while now; they do know what they're talking about.