8 Pack Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Cheers Reggie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K404 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 (edited) http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18475109 Are you going to Man up and move to Pro league now? (congrats on the position!) Edited January 3, 2013 by K404 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 (edited) Score blocked after investigation, this run is bugged (too high fps for the hardware/clocks used in GT2). Edited January 4, 2013 by Christian Ney Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhenzjhen Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 If he's gonna reproduce same score and post it again are you going to unblock it or still considered a bugged run? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Score is slightly higher than other runs with similar clockspeeds. 8-pack mentions that he used LOD and did a lot of tweaking... Since when is an extremely efficient run bugged? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose83 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Welcome to Hwbot...An normal Overclocker beats Pro Overclockers, must be bugged then lol....Accept, that that was an great run! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 GT2 is 5.15% higher than Vince. GPU memory is 3.06% higher and CPU memory is 4% higher. Check Pieter's thread on the forums here, we know LOD tuning with 600 series increases scores by ~8%, if I recall. I can't see how there is nearly enough evidence here to call his run "bugged" and block it... but I'll wait until evidence is presented. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Only one run out of 100 achieving 597xx while all other runs were always around 582xx I don't call it a "normal run" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 His score that was just 100 points below Vince's was before LOD which adds ~8% for the GTX 600 series. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moparman Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Just seems that people can't handle a non pro league beating pro league members. Great job 8pack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Ney Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 I will test the LOD thingy on monday but i doubt it's because of it according to the informations I received. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ME4ME Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Only one run out of 100 achieving 597xx while all other runs were always around 582xx I don't call it a "normal run" Not to take any side, don't have the info .. but isn't that exactly what people do in 3dmark01 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Moderators are taking down similar scores everyday in Hwbot. That is normal, when something in some particular score is not correct. Here is one comparison taken from crew section, so you can see yourself: "8pack = 5.64GHz 3930K / 1960MHz/1949MHz VGA (LOD 27) GT1= 169 (OK) GT2= 187 (Way too high for the clocks) Andre = 5.7GHz 3970X / 1855MHz/1900 VGA (LOD 27) GT1 = 174 (OK) GT2 = 173,78 (OK)" So this case have nothing to do with the 3DM01 Car low test, where you can have different type of runs. Mods will let you people know what is the outcome of this LOD 27 thing later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 What about this one? 8pack = 5.64GHz 3930K / 1960MHz/1949MHz VGA (No LOD) GT1= 170 GT2= 173 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 As you can see, that result is on the rankings normally: http://hwbot.org/submission/2340838_ That result can be directly compared to results in the previous post and with same LOD 27 setting it is just completely OK. If that 170fps GT1 would be without LOD it would be bug as well and would be removed. This case is finished and 8pack can continue to hunt top spots just like before Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xxbassplayerxx Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Where can you see that it used LOD? 8pack said he did not use LOD on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Welcome to Hwbot...An normal Overclocker beats Pro Overclockers, must be bugged then lol....Accept, that that was an great run! Welcome to HWBOT, where every single decision by the staff is considered fraud, corruption or stupidity by some community members. I have full trust in the (volunteer) moderator team doing their job in the best way they can. Most team members have been around for a while now; they do know what they're talking about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.