Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
yes, last year I have benched during my 3 weeks summer holiday to have the award, and 1 or 2 months after, everything had changed

 

f**k :o

 

Yes me too Thor I started to play in HWbot not even because of the global I just wanted the Junkie Award!

 

I got so mad when it was gone I started to bench for Globals :-)

  • Crew
Posted

What exactly you mean under the american region? USA, Canada or the countries too from both Americas? Write a letter to richba5tard or make a thread in a forum if you want such ;)

Posted

Water cooling and the other "extreme" cooling methods should have been grandfathered in. Now because pictures are required, those stats were voided and require us to start over. :P

 

+1 to "Socket King" idea.:)

Posted
What exactly you mean under the american region? USA, Canada or the countries too from both Americas? Write a letter to richba5tard or make a thread in a forum if you want such ;)

 

read massman's 1st post in this thread..threads like these are meant for hwbot people to consider good suggestions...its upto to you and the rest of the good hwbot gang to entertain suggestions...

Posted
Water cooling and the other "extreme" cooling methods should have been grandfathered in. Now because pictures are required, those stats were voided and require us to start over. :P

 

+1 to "Socket King" idea.:)

 

actually i like the pics being semi required..like retail box pics...i dunno its not that difficult...99% of users have cameras...

 

**batch/revision info for cpu perhaps?

Posted

It's perfectly doable!

 

"S462 King"

 

name - points

 

tiborrr - 308.3

Barton - 209.9

Stone_age - 155.3

Turrican - 149.9

Berserker - 143.4

The III - 131.8

hs - 123.5

michaelnm - 108.2

Bwanasoft - 92.9

RIBEIROCROSS - 84.7

qwerty84 - 74.1

maxine - 56.3

Moonman - 52.6

cnzdrn - 49.0

giukey79 - 43.0

Mr.Scott - 42.4

Patrickclouds - 42.0

pxhx - 41.0

Jaan - 39.6

Klausr@HWUS.at - 38.4

Posted

Yeah, true ... the S939 ranking is rediculous. Just no way to compete.

 

For the king, do we use the same large 'king'-icon as in the overclockers league and hardware masters ranking?

 

Otherwise we could do it like this

 

s462-king-big.jpg

  • Crew
Posted (edited)

I think 2D is enough. Another way to increase the CPU tests popularity.

And I agree with richba5tard about two levels of award. But it shouldn't be a fixed value. I think it should depend from the category. Maybe top 5-10?

 

Or at least to make a list of sockets - socket 3, 7, 8, 370, Slot 1, Slot A, 462, 423, 478, 754, 939, 775, AM2, AM2+, AM3 (or combine AM into one?), 1156, 1366. These should have a king.

 

But how to check, how much people should be awarded? It's unreal to get 100 points in s423 or socket 8. Though, you may be right about >=100 points - if the category is weak there shouldn't be many people awarded. OTOH the socket can have a low number of CPUs and despite the popularity it won't be able to get 100 points.

 

So I think some exceptions should be done. But for socket A 100 points looks fine.

 

 

As for the icon - if you're speaking about the achievement icon, it should be like you painted. If you'll make a hall of fame for the selected socket, the icon can be like in the leagues. And it would be nice to put this in the signature.

 

 

For the "Dual Socket guru" (the one that's not the king) you can take the top 10 in dual socket 7, 8, Slot1, socket 370, 462 rankings - the workstation sockets. For the dual socket you can name it "Twinhead" and put my countries crest on it :D

Edited by Antinomy
Posted

The amount of points per socket type differ a lot, so 100 isn't applicable everywhere (not that it forms a problem ... we can just change this per socket type)

 

LGA 775

 

name sum(result.hwpoints)

jabski 2486.7

GraduS 1376.4

aspms* 1083.1

dRweEz 1049.8

RoccoESA 989.1

TaPaKaH 951.4

kim55 841.2

Moonman 814.0

tiborrr 717.7

jmax_oc 712.7

westyle 704.0

demiurg 621.8

boblemagnifique 613.4

mortisboy 583.6

Maduk 582.0

Deathscyth 557.0

Pt1t 548.0

hs 544.6

Sergey13 544.4

AndreyKV 513.1

  • Crew
Posted (edited)

Maybe making it the top 10% performers in this socket if their overall number is above 100 and 10 if it's between 40 and 100? And 20% if it's under 40 persons?

 

It's just loud thinking, you are welcome to discuss the calculation.

Edited by Antinomy
  • Crew
Posted

Then the cap should be revised sometimes under certain conditions. For example if the number of such gurus doubles. I don't say their number should stay the same though.

 

 

Then how about posting the lists for each socket? I think there shouldn't be more than 10 gurus in categories like socket A.

how are those points calculated?

your complete points you have with all your submissions in a specific socket type(e.g. s775, etc.)?

yes.
Posted
how are those points calculated?

your complete points you have with all your submissions in a specific socket type(e.g. s775, etc.)?

 

Sum of hardware points of all submissions using X socket

Posted
Then the cap should be revised sometimes under certain conditions. For example if the number of such gurus doubles. I don't say their number should stay the same though.

 

Then how about posting the lists for each socket? I think there shouldn't be more than 10 gurus in categories like socket A.yes.

 

Revising caps is kind of difficult. It would suck damn hard if you pushed a few weeks for the title and then see it taken away because you're the 11th to reach it :P

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...