Submission & member moderation

Take a look at this: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=873225 (note the 64kB L2) I would understand if it was CPU-Z bug, but the performance product in PiFast sucks aswell http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=505&applicationId=6&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100

I was wondering if a mod could look into our team ranking for wPrime 32M.... We have 11 member submissions, and by my calculation we should be ranked #15, however it shows our ranking as #690. Would someone mind taking a look? Our team: NBOC :: No Borders OC Team Thanks! ~ether

Nothing strange? like 8 cored X7460? or 8 socket Xeon server?

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=869363 wrong video card, lot of points and it's moderated

This has been dragging on for almost 2 weeks now, I dont like prodding the result mods but its a double whammy for me and its beginning to grate. 1/ The guy in 1st place is using GPU PhysX (AMD dually @ 2.6GHz, CPU score- 22K) 2/ I was knocked down to 2nd place because of it then some guy reported MY score for using PhysX when i've not. Please can some kindly soul clear this up? as a minor extra to point one, the guy has almost mis-labelling his GPU clocks. Hes at 750/ 1030, not 575/850

could someone please add the intel T3000 to the list of processors? Here's a CPU-Z of the chip: http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=603749

My wPrime 1024 score was flagged by a mod for: "reported by user due to lack of validation (Need checksum, only screenshot.) " By this, I assume he means validation? I was under the impression that validation was only required for global Top 20 scores. Is this not correct? This was for my X2 550 run.... TIA, ~ether

3Dmark 2001 - 92668 marks - zafiropo (H.O.T. (Hellas O/C Team)) Processor: Core 2 E8600 (3.33G... @ 5498mhz [ view screenshot ] Videocard: 2x GeForce 7950 GT @ 714/819mhz on Air Motherboard: ASUS RE Global Rank: 214th - 8.7 points Description: 92668 - E8600@5498 - Nvidia 7950 GT SLI @ 714/817 Scan date: 28-06-2009 01:01 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=869266 3Dmark 2001 - 90389 marks - alibabar (OC-Lab) Processor: Core 2 E8600 (3.33G... @ 5450mhz on SS Videocard: 2x GeForce 7950 GT @ 760/835mhz Memory: 2048MB DDR3 PC16000 @ 1818mhz CL7.0 7-7-18 1T Motherboard: Rampage Extreme Hardware Rank: 2nd 2x GeForce 7950 GT …

and it is a good submittal. Can you stop the bull ??? http://www.hwbot.org/community/user/Ol%27Bud http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?userId=20583&applicationId=9 There is no way to select "default settings" on PCMARK05. And who is this numb nut? >Arman-Naddafi..??? Boy if he doesn't like that score, Wait until he sees the one from the water cooling on this GA-MA790FXT-UD5P and the AMD PHENOM II X4 955. Someone with their head screwed on straight should look at all the high scores on that complainants account. There is no cause to complain here about my submittal. Mr.Clarke

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=723603 - This score is way to good for rig like that.(Frequencys and so on) Secondly he has flashed his vga to "XT" and this score should be in "XT" category then..

When I report him I get the screen ''it may is to our crappy coding skill'' so the only way is to do it manual.He has submitted a superpi run as an Pifast one.Please edit his submittion

Would someone double check the following CPUZ score of 2443 Mhz in the 2200+ XP-M Tbred class against the image shown in the submission? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593521 As near as I can tell, it appears the verification screenshot shows 2223 Mhz, not 2443 Mhz. Attempted to report this through normal channels, but the "Oh Crap" error appeared saying it must be a coding error and cannot be reported that way.

Hey Guys, today we submitted a 3DMark03 Result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=872465 In ORB I can not pusblish the Result, so what I can do? I took a screenshot of the Result compare of ORB... I write this in the result but NeoForce has blocked it... Why?

Please check this result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606222 Note the time lenght of Loops 4-7. A big discrepancies occur, the run looks like it is bugged somehow (perhaps CPU is overclocked a tad too high) therefore should be removed from the database.

I see the scores got deleted. why?

I'am post a new HoF there are more one a month and I have not a point... There are a reason? Thanks http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/K6%20233mhz

Hey Guys, at first I want to thank you for all the hard work what you guys does here on hwbot! Thanks a lot! But we have a little issue! If we made a score what is better than the old one, we delete the old score (because it don't have points) BUT if a result was moderated and checked the Delete button is no more available and we can delete this score. Can someone explain me why? Is this right so or is it a bug? examples: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810035 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=868860 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=810033

Hi, this user submitted the wrong time in Pifast: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=871803 he submitted his series computing time and this is not the total time of the benchmark. Thanks and regards Afrokalle

Hi all... this result is a fourth place (in theory) but is on the fifth. Why? Sorry for my bed english... Thank you bye

3Dmark 2003 - 102919 marks - benne (Guru3D) 5.1 points Processor: Core 2 E8600 (3.33G... @ 5mhz no image Videocard: 2x GeForce GTX 275 @ 700/1280mhz Global Rank: 395th - 2.6 points Hardware Rank: 4th 2x GeForce GTX 275 - 2.5 points Scan date: 17-06-2009 12:12 Compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=865506 3Dmark 2003 - 102919 marks - benny (Guru3D) 4.7 points Processor: Core 2 E8600 (3.33G... @ 3330mhz no image Videocard: 2x GeForce GTX 275 @ 700/1300mhz Global Rank: 396th - 2.6 points Hardware Rank: 5th 2x GeForce GTX 275 - 2.1 points Description: 2x gtx 275 @700/1300 - e8600 @ 4.70 Scan date: 16-06-2009 09:03 Compar…

Does the "New Rule" that allows mods to ignore what are deemed to be "insignificant errors" allow the posting of times from processors in the wrong classifications? For example is it "insignificant" to post up an Athlon XP processor as if it were an Athlon MP? These irregularities are obvious when the processor descriptions in the CPUZ screenies are viewed.

Did I do something wrong when entering the memory amount? If you look here the memory amount is listed as 6291456MB instead of 6144MB. Am I able to correct the issue or will a staff member do it for me? Apologies for my lack of knowledge, but I have just registered and I am unfamiliar with the ins and outs here

http://www.hwbot.org/community/user/RemiKo User has many scores in category SPI 1M and PiFast which is very similar in appearance For example http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835626 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835421 Screens show the same checksum and subtime but final time is different. Submit in two other cpu category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=860610 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=836144 Screen is the same in every piksel, only final time is diffrent and submit in two cpus http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835625 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835362 Screens is doing in the same time on system…

Hi I have just added the orb link to my blocked 05 Run http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=233769&thumb=false - sorry but I didnt realise it was a top 20 run I also have another issue where someone has just deleted my AQ3 run (not blocked) and I got the following email.... An hwbot crew member, demiurg, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'impossible score at given settings. might be a cheat.'. This was the reason the user gave: 4870X2 in Vista can not be faster GTX 295 in XP http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=859870 Well thats someones opinion - but I would have thought I would have the chance to defend myse…

Can someone tell me how it is possible to get such a high score in CPU test #2 in this submission? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=866479 it is phenomenal compared to all others.