Mr.Scott

Why is validation @ 400.6 and SS is 406?

From the mod that tried to pull a fast one via loophole. EDIT- thread should probably be closed. It's just creating animosity between members now.

Wrong. No pics of storage. Strike 2 for you. Reading is fundamental. http://hwbot.org/submission/2349002_schmuckley_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_965_be_27549_marks http://hwbot.org/submission/2349159_schmuckley_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_26792_marks

Hold a grudge much Schmuck? It's been a week and you're still cryin. I see you're still checking Paco's stuff too. It's all good. I see how it's gonna be.

I'm a guy. We don't read directions until it's either too late or we're goated into it by a broad.

Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it.

Thanks. Did not even think to look there.

Why don't you publicize it right here. More than one person doesn't know how to do this I'm sure.

It's called a chiller. Technically it's still considered water.

Very well. I'll advise Paco now. Thanks for the polite explanation.

Really? I think you're wrong. http://hwbot.org/submission/2325462_gluvocio_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_45849_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2263057_s_a_v_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_47057_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2336036_sofos1990_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_48865_marks/ http://hwbot.org/submission/2336688_moose83_pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x4_960t_be_49299_marks/

Guess I misunderstood you. I thought you were saying Expert Tool wasn't allowed. No dispute on the sector change. Same setup on this sub. http://hwbot.org/submission/2346866_vapor._pcmark_2005_phenom_ii_x2_560_be_39280_marks

Actually, that IS allowed. Only the sector size change isn't.

ClockGen for NF4. http://classicplatforms.com/downloads/oc_apps/CG-NVNF4.zip

We are similar in our reasoning. Thanks for the support Bob.

That was the one Paco reported 9 months ago. What sparked the rage was roughly all of his PCM05 runs since 1/1 were reported by yours truly. I can assure you it wasn't personal............but I'm a douche, remember? Techjesse's issue with me was for the same reason. Doesn't really matter. Don't want the possibility of being reported?, check your subs before somebody else does.

Not losing sleep over it. Thanks bro.

I get that, thanks. :celebration:

Glad to see your opinion of me hasn't changed. I don't care either way. Soon I'll be able to sit at Massman's table, loved by thousands, hated by millions.

Alex, I understand the reason why it was done, but it sets a bad example. Now others will try the same thing to add missing info and think it's ok to do so in this method, and then use CN's sub as an example to say "see it was ok here".

Hahahahaha.....enough of your foolishness.

I did it.......logged on under Paco's name. Come at me again, so I can knock you down again bigmouth.

Doesn't say anything about which result on the rules page. Not saying it's right or wrong, just sayin.........

Qft .

Because that's how it works Frank. It's never the person that submitted the flawed subs fault, it's whoever reports it's fault. I'm very sorry Mr. Schmuck (and others) that you didn't find it important to maybe read the rules before you submitted, especially knowing that PCM05 has been going through many changes to start with. I can totally see why that would be my fault.