Bones

I'll keep working with it and see if I can't get the security patch to install, that being the root of my problem here as my screenie shows. If I can't, I guess I'm out. Do what will work best for the comp, I'm not looking to be accomidated or I'd be in contradiction of myself. I have to assume you've already looked at and rejected OHM that's within the X265 benchmark - That works fine and it's a standalone proggy too if it needs to be.

You guys can do whatever - At this point if it's used, unless I can make HWinfo work I'm already done. Error 3033292 (Security update.... WHY IDFH does a hardware monitoring program NEED a security update just to run?) and then something about another error after that. I've already gotten the update to fix 3033292 but the fix refuses to install and throws yet another error as shown below. I was like "Out of all the programs out there for such, They would just have to pick THE ONE monitoring program that puts you through hell to use"........ Then I was over it. ? Bad thing is my benching area has no web connection/service too and I've been trying to make it work on my daily here and of course it doesn't.

I do see the MHz limitation with that being the only limitation shown for DIV I. From the way it's layed out ATM I take it Div I is well, for anything right? I know there should be something specific here but it's not saying what it is (For now anyway). ?

One thing to note is that the board has a built-in CPU OV protection of 2.0v's and will kick in if modded or not, at least that's been the history of it. If this mod can truly negate the CPU OV protection that's a real win, every voltmod I've ever seen done before could never get around it. Speaking of such I still have a couple of these boards around, both can hit 240(+) on the bus with no voltmods done running the right chip but both are A7N8X Deluxe 2.0's, I don't currently own any of the -E boards. BTW the ones I have are also a good alternative like the -E version, as long as it's a 2.0 board it should be OK. And I'll just say good job TR! ?

This question will have to be asked in the forum's support section. If you ever have an issue that's the place to ask about problems you're having.

Can't seem to fiqure this out, always getting that my sub is invalid. I can save the result and sub it, run the bench online while logged into the site..... Doesn't matter what I do it keeps saying my run is invalid. Also noted it always reads my CPU speed as stock, not for where it's set in the BIOS/where it's actually running at. This is the sub I tried to enter and had to disable points because of this. Bones`s HWBOT Prime 30min score: 8400761 max prime with a Core i3 7350K EDIT: Just saw the other thread about it and posted there. ?

Excellent!

Beat me to it but yep - It does.

Yep - All 3D benchies requires the sensor tabs in GPU-Z to be shown in the screenie. That would be all stages from 6-10 to be exact. Be sure to read the rules for each stage you'll be competing in.

Perfect! ?

Nice work Darth!

I'm waiting for the auction to be #1 to start..... Anytime guys....... Still waiting. BTW where the hell is my credit card? ?

Nice run! Good to see you're still kicking, I hope you and yours are doing well.

Guys, I'll thrown in on the subject of swapping teams. Some have said it was done because their teams were either small or inactive, I'm not going to say those aren't good reasons nor can say if it's right or wrong (Pass judgement). I am an example of someone that was on a team that was both, small and inactive yet last year I benched in both TC and CC on my own inspite of it. Did rather well considering all things and even won a prize from the CC part of it in the end. Didn't have to change teams, I just did it. If someone is really determined to bench they will do what I did, bench regardless and just enjoy the competition. No you won't be in the running to actually win the comp but in my case it was to see how competitive I could be on my own, that is to say "Gauge" how well I was doing vs everyone else and that is certainly a way to see how well you're doing if anything. However I will say it does change the dynamic of a team's makeup and overall results because it most certainly will. ~End ✌️ cents worth for whatever it's worth if anything to anyone.~

You guys are right, only for the mem part of it but I did them all that way regardless to make sure what I subbed was "Legal". Better a little extra than not enough.

Who'd a thunk it possible for Splave to be running AMD? But of course it is..... Great job! ?

An additional problem is not all the required tabs are in the screenie. Even if the rendered scene wasn't covered the RAM SPD info isn't there and that was made a requirement for this year's comp for all entries. May not be the case next year but was for this one.

If you haven't tried it already, go into the actual stage itself and use the submission tab there. I've ran into this before and that's how I've been doing subs since that happened.

No way that's legit.

I did an entry earlier and although it "Seems" to be right I'm not sure. These are XPG sticks as my entry shows and there is a pic of the system showing these in use. If not already in the database would like for them to be and I will correct the entry once done. BTW here's a link to what these are: ADATA XPG SPECTRIX D80 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 3600 (PC4 28800) Desktop Memory Model AX4U360038G17-DR80 - Newegg.com

The sub has points disabled but still not valid. The screenie of what's shown looks like it was taken by a camera instead of it being an actual screenshot too, this won't fly at all. Knock it down and explain it all to the guy is all I could say.

No, the board shown in his system pic with this entry is an Ultra A. It's still a good board, just not on par with the Ultra B version.

I second this - I've never known Alpi to try and pull crap and I believe it's legit. Good run Alpi!

To point 1, I DO check the rules when comps start to be sure I haven't overlooked anything. Even by doing that I've gotten it wrong before, instead of wasting effort griping I just made sure the next time it was done right. My first sub in the DDR part of this comp is the latest from me, was done and such BUT I forgot to include a closeup of my sticks. Even though all the rest was fine it wasn't a "Correct" entry so it had to be thrown out... And I'm good with that and will get it right the next time whenever this happens, doublechecking the rules being part of that process. Like everything else they are subject to change and it's the bencher's responsibility to be aware of and to comply with said rules. This was established long ago as just being "How it is" so we all have to play by that. To point 2, it's nothing about you - This was about Damion reporting a sub ALREADY said to be fine yet he continued reporting it..... Multiple times at that. This is just part of what I had said here earlier, this relating mainly to part 2 of this post: https://community.hwbot.org/topic/175335-hwbot-rev71-point-recalculation-in-progress/?do=findComment&comment=507791

The rule about not covering any of the rendered scene has been in place for a few months at the very least, if this run was done and subbed recently then there is simply no excuse. Also, since the subject entry of this thread had already been determined as "Valid" yet it got reported more then once AFTER the staff determined it to be OK, that's not a good thing. I do hope this wasn't a "If you can't beat 'em, report 'em" tactic because that's just not cool if so.