yosarianilives

These chips fullpot, too bad they scale like garbage

Chip boots 8030 on single module at 2.05v vcore with minimal tweaking and no pscheck and almost validated. Also run r11.5 at 7.4 1.9v. Can't wait to see this chip when I have time to bench it properly.

Wow! Nice chip!

Edit: apparently that tweak wasn't public, so at request of originator of this sooper sekrits tweakz removing. I personally think that not sharing tweakz hurts the community and is partially responsible for lack of growth here but it also apparently wasn't my tweak to share. Sorry ya'll I thought it was well known ?‍♀️

Without boost max multi is 14.5, you can set single core multi up to 16x with boost but I believe that there may also be a way to get 16x for all cores. Disabling boost hasn't worked for me.

Also question since I'm still a noob at this platform, how did you lock all cores to max single core boost multi if you care to share?

I've used that tactic before, but only because people are lazy when they sub intel hd graphics and don't bother to match to the correct gpu. Really hard to compete in low end hd graphics (sandy bridge) when the number one score was on a 4770k

That said I wouldn't mind another 5 or even 6 sub gcn1 stage this year for CC. This time I will have HD 8970 ready ?

But fm1 is one of the cheapest platforms in the comp? People have zero issue pulling out the soldering iron on $600+ cards for 3d stages yet it's too much of a monetary risk to potentially brick the bios on a $50 board? There is no logic in your argument. Just admit that you were wrong previously and move on. If you want to complain about "risky" "expensive" stages then perhaps complain about the dual gpu stage that allows titan's and will likely need mods on all 6 cards to be truly competiive or the IGP stage that require 2 scores from $800+ intel NUC's if you want to be competive.

Yes, I'm quite glad that he has fixed the rest of the zosma chips as well. I would be pissed if I had bought a stack of 840t's for nothing.

Don't forget the Athlon x4's 640 (zosma) and 645t. although those are already listed as zosma

Please don't ban this cpu as some people have already bought a fair amount for binning under the understanding that it is in fact zosma which it is. I would not be very happy if my 20+ cpus were a waste of funds that could've gone to something useful.

Seems to have cold slow around 0c. Inside freezer cpu held -10c and scored worse than stock 20-30c. This test ran at 0-10c after I pulled out of the freezer

That may be too often. Sometimes I sub every weekend for several months, but sometimes I also go several months without subbing because I'm binning or I just test many things and nothing really works out correctly. You'd need a combination of forum and submissions if you wanted to see who was truly active empirically.

I think that it should be allowed so that people don't have to worry about making ln2 subs for the comp that'll be beaten on air after comp closes.

So then for example this score should be pulled from the comp? (not trying to call you out mac, I think it should be legal and would love to sub on 300 series)

I second this, vas is disgusting and can do bad things if it works it's way into sockets.

Pretty sure he's saying win 10 is slooow

In the database they are listed as Grenada even though they're Hawaii. As there would need to be hw purchased I'd like to verify before hand.

For stage 7 does R9 390/x count as Hawaii?

Did you try 3.2 with all services enabled?

Did you also try unselecting all but screenshot when you save the file?

Would love to see this on ln2, should do 1800+

But it saves the file correctly when set to off?

Try different options for hwinfo, for some reason if you have the wrong one selected it crashes. I believe you need to select hwinfo in safe mode when you run the bench.