chew*

If testing those pins you will test one pin in socket and all resistors in general area both sides. When you find continuity you test other pin in socket and other side of resistor. Just solder across that resistor and you should be good to go.

It's actually preety slow No need to guess. you will find continuity at a resistor on both sides and each of these 2 points on all 1156 boards. http://chew.ln2cooling.com/Max%20III%20Extreme/Hard%20mods/IMG_2671.JPG Ok here' you go....... clarkdale CBB mod point circled green according to pin outs.

I jumped in for you Despite my workload.......now it's time for me to ship stuff and pack up for quakecon, see you guys after the 15th sometime....... Ok this is preety funny I propose that giga gives away 1 prize.......but not for the best scores.....a prize for the most ridiculous hardware config imagineable LOL

Hmm interesting contest

Actually thuban IMC will not play a role, as i was saying there's only a couple board that clock highe but the performance is slack.....move to a couple other boards and all hit a wall at 920 and have performance of the board that can do 1000 max cold. so since deneb can do 920....and clocks higher and has high cpc performance.....it's guranteed win.....it will play out like this. The more effecient board tuned for ultimate overall performance and a very fast card excluding 5XXX series on ln2. My prediction from ati camp is 4890/4870 with favor towards 4870 if someone really goes all out with mods. As far as nvidia, i will leave that prediction to someone more knowlegable on NV. I might toss up a result but i won't have time to play hard. I think i have one 965 left that would be well suited to 01 and a decent 4890, board will be CH3 or MSI. I might even favor a damn good set of d9's @ 6-5-5 over hypers at 6-6-6.

Ok

I call 965/955 winning this over thuban. Only one thuban in world can match 955/965 for raw clocks...... Only one board is capable of insane ram speed with thuban, that speed is sheared to 2000 when cold and bandwidth is not that great etc deneb faster cpc.

not mine, hang c1 hang 8.8. then everything just shut off....game over.

Your putting words in my mouth. If anything I gave every "tip" possible without saying it flat out that thuban would not win this part of contest

clearly one chip needs alot more voltage to do XX speed and the other chip isn't fond of volts

He's at work. He benched on my board with his cpu at my house thats how i know

I will vouch for the mobo used , he screwed up when he took his screenshot and has times a tad slower with it. Also he has many photos to back it up. If anyone want's to call me a liar and be unsportsman like feel free to reject it

Becasue at same exact speeds on same exact board 32m is 10 secs slower than deneb......

I did, I used thuban

Btw bruce has 2x512m as well. Your latency is faster....ram speed is not the total equasion for latency....cpu speed is. At your speed latency looks like it Bugged by 2ns which we have seen.

well look at massman myself and bruce. All our scores are consistent. Unelss of course we just don't know what we are doing

I think you may be victim of bugged latency >>>> do a compare here http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=1017603&title=Highest score of Massman

True but then again a mod actually benching this bench would be better at determining whats bugged and whats not. However it doesn't take much common sense to compare your own scores to others to figure out what is legit and whats not. Quite a few legit baseline results out there now.

bugged latency why would you keep posting bugged latency scores......your latency should be around 40+ if not more at your speeds.

bugged latency

bugged latency

No pressure

hmmm it looks right to me, most of these newer chips/boards have trouble with it (1/1). Based on the ddr 1 results it looks right on par. These newer cpu's just seem to be less effecient.

preety crazy latency with that 3800 chip bruce

Looking good, I forsee a new 1st place on ln2.