Hyperhorn

I guess it`s a Nehalem setup.

Another try 01: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735565 03: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735567 05: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735568 AM3: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=735570 These scores were already reported/moderated, but moved into the wrong categoy back then. Please move the scores into this correct category: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_x1550_256mb_rv_515_64_bit (My 06 score is already there)

...because it would match that nice to my nickname. [x] Individual benchmarks for individual Overclockers like Hyper Pi, Mass Pi, knopfler Pi and so on

A great problem IMO is the fact, that hardware circulates in forum marketplaces and as a buyer you can`t judge if the specific hardware was already used for hwbot or not. If you buy stuff from a team mate and he hasn`t already used the hardware for hwbot (e.g. daily PC only) it can still happen, that the first owner (that did sell the stuff to your team mate) used the component for hwbot. I`m not even talking about Ebay/OCbay, because it`s even harder to find out the history of the hardware, you would like to buy.

Oh, it`s my fault. I didn`t notice it`s about the modified Hwbot Country Cup 2009 rules. Sorry!

I`m not sure what you are trying to tell us, but using the HT/SMT-feature of an Atom 230 is fine. The screenshot is okay, too.

No answer or action after months and several friendly reminders, but I still think that the mentioned scores @ the first link have to get moved and it`s not fun at all to steal a validation.

I mentioned this stuff in this thread over four months ago including several reminders and didn`t get a single word as an answer until today. So even if it would be my fault and my whole concern would be so wrong that I should actually feel ashamed, you could atleast teach me so. But this is very disappointing. Edit: And by the way the Pentium 4 505 isn`t Paxville, which is claimed here. Dual-core-Xeon CPUs for socket 604 had Paxville cores, but Pentium 4 505 have Prescott ones.

I think it`s just about the main purpose of the benchtable (air/water vs. Dice/LN2/LHe) and not about the age itself (e.g. established Team Japan style). Maybe it`s just more popular, because the CPUs had often no heatspreader back then and I guess you can break the die with a clamp very quick.

?

Awesome

...plus no subtest details visable. Already deleted by a team captain of PC Games Hardware.

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486 Nothing happened yet. Some goes for this one, which was mentioned by u22 (thx ) in this thread. I reported it already, too. See, neither I open threads for trivial requests as so much other guys do immediately (and get an answer asap unfortunately...), nor I annoy moderators somewhere else. But this official modest way leads to nothing and I have no idea what else to do.

XS forum was very slow the last days, but fortunately not steady offline. Let`s hope they can fix it.

http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=32830&postcount=486 Persevering I am, young Jedi! I know it`s annoying to move around some unimportant scores, but they are already moderated so there`s nothing I can do to help you.

I`ve heard that Massman is looking out for a 80-CPU-server by order of rb to keep up with the growing hwbot database. Do you think he is going to... do something? j/k of course

IMO Wprime belongs to the server guys as all the other benchmarks belong to the overclockers with access to extreme cooling. New CPUs will arrive (e.g. Gulftown) and the extreme overclockers will decrease their times, too. It`s not that hwbot gets flooded by server farms. If you look at the Top 20 you will see many Skulltrail system, actually more than professional server racks.

*cough* *cough* You know I love the whole Hwbot crew idolatrously.

You didn`t use Super Pi Mod, so this just shows the effect of rounding. Comparison between Mod and Non-Mod-Super-Pi is always questionable IMO.

Had the same issue with FF 3.0.10 today (even after refresh), but now it`s gone.

Good idea

Well, the hwbot crew is for sure not opinionated and had its reason to do so. Instead of calling them idiots it might be the better idea to ask for the specific reasons FIRST and tell them, why you (dis)agree.

Don`t worry Sergio. I`ve even seen reviews of new Quadcore-CPUs where they used Wprime and one thread.

I guess you are using Vista 64 Bit? It`s possible. The easy way: Delete "Direcpll.dll" and try to run AM3 again The option: Google for "Aquamark 64 Bit patch" and copy this into your folder. But anyway, AM3 runs slow with Vista so don`t wish too much here.