knopflerbruce

He won't get banned for this, but I'll send him a PM or an email.

Fine

This sounds like something for Massman. However, I checked the points listed in your profile, and they add up to about 780. Why they dropped to 722 at some point I do not know.

Depends, freeze-reboot would usually work. Power off, power on manually - no go. 4 LEDs.

Ticket ID: 1812 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/sx6qyw\r\n\r\nIt does say E3000, but it\'s a higher model than the others. I think I bought it as an E3900. There\'s also an E6900 on HWBot, which says E6000 in CPUz. Do as you wish, but choose between E3000/E6000 and E3900/E6900 - makes the most sense.

Ticket ID: 1811 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/99digz\r\n\r\n333x9.5 stock.

I have a C4E and a C5F with CBB around -100... it usually works to drop the temp in windows, though.

I should've posted what I have on the bench drive, would've reached 5000 on the top 5 ranking.

The rules are clear. Personally I call it an obvious error in the rules, but my opinion is that it's been too long to change this now. I've even started to run it this way myself as nothing was done about it in July.

You can, at least for now.

I need to improve my Intel fanboy CPU ranking.

The beta becnchmarks are barely being benched at all (maybe one or two exceptions). Can't really compare that to 3dmarks, where you also have alot more accessible multi-GPU categories for each benchmark.

I haven't tested these cards much, but it could be that the amount of memory matters in a benchmark or two - 128MB isn't much... 06 and Unigine DX9? We need to make different categories for different models (xt, gs and so on), memory bus width, memory IC generation and # of pipelines enabled by default. There will be alot of categories for these cards no matter what we do. You can add separate categories if the AMOUNT of memory makes a noticeable difference as well.

There is a bug somewhere, I've had this happen alot with hyperpi and superpi 32m subs, but not so much with 1m... usually it helps recalculating each sub,. it's what I did when I "activated" the points on your sub.

I voted yes, too. Not sure if I can, but we'll see

Massman will take care of the 775 question, perhaps he should write a special note on 775 CPUs for that stage

Modded gif in my head: m.beier's head sneaking in from the lower-left corner.

Ticket ID: 1804 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/lnhrnj\r\n\r\n200x13 stock.

Ticket ID: 1803 Priority: Low http://valid.canardpc.com/hsrxet\r\n\r\n200x17.5 stock. 59w tdp according to CPUZ, but 65w listed on CPU-world. Also, it\'s a \"fake\" Phenom - no L2 cache, all these are Regor based AFAIK.

....and it's a winner. Nicely done, Vince

This? http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Asus-A8N-SLI-Premium-Socket-939-Motherboard-CPU-Memory-/121196156574?pt=UK_Computing_LaptopMotherboards_CPUs_CA&hash=item1c37da969e - you can sell the sticks and CPU if you wish.

I'm no expert, but I ran FaH for a while. Can't do that again before I get out of this shitty basement

One can choose division as one wants, right? As long as you're in the XOL to begin with.

1.7v, too STINKS fake. Let him prove it's not

If this is the issue I know of, you only have to run some other things at the same time. That's fair enough, it's no different than running explorer.exe while benching.