bolc

I just benched a q9400 slb6b coeff x8 and had no trouble with the aio for similar voltages, so there was nothing to worry with the q8200 coeff x7 http://hwbot.org/submission/3817911_bolc_superpi___32m_core_2_quad_q9400_10min_54sec_78ms and now I am quite sure I should be able to take #2 rank with this board for max frequency, if the cpu does not wall... http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1692&cores=4#start=0#interval=20

http://hwbot.org/submission/3818758_bolc_pifast_core_2_quad_q8200_25sec_280ms it is really good man, I used my 2nd best or what I thought was my 2nd best ep45 ud3p to bench it on a 240mm AIO, went from 1.64 to 1.70 V, and the cpu went all the way to 565 max fsb... which is pretty much the max fsb of my best ud3p on quads, so far. ok I pushed further vtt and nb to get there on this board, but it may surely do close to 570 on the other board /and/or on cold if I didn t hit the chip fsb wall. it gave me some practice at least and some fun, I was happy to best scannick

umounted it and read q8200, hence my first guess, but the code name is SL9GT... so Q8200S... will have to move everything to this category. The scores were amazing though...

damned I didn t see that. I will take a picture of the cpu to make sure when my spi32m run is over. I would be pissed if that is the case...

hw points seem ok, although sometimes the whole set of subs of a given bench / cpu go away and come back. but in my case, all my hwpoints seem fine. the global are fine too since I recalculated them to make sure I did not have "fake" points, which helped or it did adjust itself but all is fine except the x265 4k global on g470. however, for many users, the globals are artificially high, hence as is the ranking. but they will come down soon here. I like my 1200 hwpts and expect about 250 global, so I should be in the top 10 for sure, maybe 7-8ish Ps: check the rounding and exxact value on your 0.61 note, in fact it is 0.6066 fps. to get to 0.6151 to get a 0.62 is a long way... and if x265 2.2.0 becomes mandatory, no more easy rounding x265 2.2.0 now calculates 3 digits after the point (thanks to me complaining...? :D) https://hwbot.org/submission/3803493_bolc_hwbot_x265_benchmark___1080p_core_i7_7700k_45.273_fps in that example, I am not sure if they truncate or round : 45.273 becomes 45.27, but what would happen to 45.276, rounding to 45.28 or truncating ti 45.27...? so 0.608 may become 0.61 but might still be ranked after yours since you submitted first. since I am sure they will not manually check any 2.1.0 and older subs to get out the 3 digits number, but how the 3 digits will come out is still a mystery. they will round probably, but hopefully will use the 3 digits to establish ranking

You got me upset :D

entre mes mains, un core2quad 465 nm c est 540 minimum en max frequence :o :D

still the best :D globals are gone again... :o

Hi mat I tend to have consistent and no bug so far on 3.1 but on 3.1.1 and 3.2 I also do. This is a vague statement of course... on 3.2 my biggest issue is that the checksum for saving the file is given as bad, while no pb at all on 3.1. on 3.1.1 i get some crashes on hwinfo loading. apart form that, this gpupi is a lovely tool keep it up. and thank you !

sweet handling of ddr3 on the ep45t extreme !

gg ;)

Hello, Any updates regarding global points which can be completely wrong? Thanks for the hard work ++

and these are my 4th best cas4 kit... full timings are similar to those of vukashin but not exactly the same https://d1ebmxcfh8bf9c.cloudfront.net/u21439/image_id_200681.png

not very high, 2.3 V here but they do 560 cas4 à 2.28 V so 2.3 V is for some safety

do you mean rev 7 recalc went through but was incomplete, and a whole recalculation had to be done again? hopefully the system is smart, when recal is pushed by a user many times it only does it once ... PS: i am still jealous for the 3470 how many did you bin? I need to test this M5E check if it beats my M5F...

yeah I saw / noticed you ran spi32m on win7, was kind of suprised but I used to do the same but your other 2 subs for gb3 multi and cbr11.5, and even the spi32, are qui decent no gtx 4xx lying around? but I understand the logic, I also don t pay too much attention to competitions to the point of buying hardware specifically for it, and do with what I have. I stumbled upon a 2500k, the batch said: you may have a champion, and I had lots of fun with it !!! almost hit 5.8 ghz, my perosnnal record, and spi32m at 5.75

going to submit to div7 ... ?

hey dude which change are you referring to ? some global score ranking change was implemented?

yeah that too.... who knows when the scoring will be right. for now, waiting is the only option

5773.82 precisely

Hi. correct your frequency to 5773.8, rounding is not allowed

Hi Thanks for the info listing my stuck subs to have them at hand http://hwbot.org/submission/3808628_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808629_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808625_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808744_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808734_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808746_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808745_

Hello, Since many subs for 2500k were not updating, I forced recalculation but that did not improve the situation. In the end I eventually deleted and resubmitted manually (not using previous). which helped for some submissions. However, I still have 3 not showing up rankings or points: http://hwbot.org/submission/3808628_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808629_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3808625_ Strange thing though, my walls shows points attributed to 2 out of 3 of these subs, but the page of the sub itself stays at 0 points. Is there any trick to avoid this? What to do ? Thanks in advance.

Hi all, Same here since yesterday, subs will not get synchronised, and many globals are off, either 1 pts, or 64.8 to everybody all,

Hi On the same note, global points are messed up lately Examples here: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=0&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=34&cores=4#start=34#interval=20 or subs will not get synchronized: http://hwbot.org/submission/3807528_ http://hwbot.org/submission/3807416_ this thing used to work about right Keep it up an please let us know