bolc

???

Price update: 15 per kit UP

Hi Has the dust settled done, are all HW and GL now properly calculated? I have a question on the side. If someone has mis-submitted a score placing him, say 5th. When he deletes/edits his sub, will previous #6 7 etc becoming #5 #6 etc, get more points than what they had ? Cheers ++

hi, correct your sub. mistype, 8.923 not 8.293

Hey just to get some idea of how good may be my 7700k, do you recall what voltage yours did for cbr15 @ 5 ghz ? ++

Well done man ;)

+1 glad to see the idea I had was not that bad and will be enforced, hehe

I tried only on the 7600k, it may also crash here with q9550 with or without skipping cpu detection...

The app crashes when you save a file to submit later, with normal or legacy version (I had it on ep45 ud3p q9550 and maximus 8 ranger 7600k) if you click to SKIP CPU detection. For q9550, I did not do hwinfo detection. For 7600K I did detection, but it crashed in both cases. If I do not skip cpu detection, file is saved normally, no app crash. Hope this is clear, and may help

i took a screenshot which i will post when i can, but the legacy works with hwinfo disabled i guess my c++ 2015 got corrupted since i could run 3.1 not long ago. i got an appcrash on file saving, I was happy the calculation ran fine, and faster (36sec instead of 47) but no file saved

a new xtu ver affects global points but not the hw score isn it?

i could run 3.1 without c++ 2015 i think on the legacy version, i tried safe mode, will put it off next on the normal version, appcrash on opening thanks

Legacy edition starts but crashes on running confirmation ep45-ud3p / q9550

Vcomp140.dll missing c++ 2015 required ? ok so with c++ 2015, appcrash when loading, on win7 64 pro edition

I am for opening a new category : keeping the actual "gpupi OpenCL" bench and opening "gpupi OpenMP" bench so nobody is hurt, and more soft to bench is always nice to have

+1 with george why not making a separate gpupi 3.3 opencl-less scoring ? so one up to gpupi 3.2 and one as of 3.3 ?

I make only offline save and submit later files

Well done

bump

my kingston hyperx with hyper can do (voltage for each stick) so no issue to get 2300 888 24 1t if the imc wants i am more afraid that subtimings will be harder to tighten on hyper than on psc, and I have no bbse capable of similar results, hum, let me see I have these crazy bbse that do didn t know they could go to 2666 cas9 might do 2280 cas8.... to check one day

good to know, I might give a try at 2280+ cas8, but 8 10 8 24 1t with tight subs with psc, against 8 8 8 24 but perhpas with losser subtimings. will see

ok got it, i was stuck with rev6, sams rank = same score top10 would have been nicer

I am left to do 0.6051, but given you did 0.606ish with 109.9 bclk...? I am screwed or hope 2.2 can do miracles

http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=0&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 as of #7 and 0.59 fps, all 0.59 get 28.5 pts. glad I worked so hard for 0.6... given I had 0.6 at 12.19 AM :cry:

Luumi and I submitted on 1/25 both 0.6 fps, I believe my screenshot (3am) is earlier than his (8.30 morning or evening) but I am #6 and he is #5 we don t see time stamp though for the submission, I guess I submitted right away http://hwbot.org/submission/3768609_luumi_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_celeron_g470_0.6_fps http://hwbot.org/submission/3769054_bolc_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_celeron_g470_0.6_fps