bolc

date will sort out yes, but since when there is a bonus for first 5 places...? :cry: global looks ok on the ua for x265 4k, but for xtu, there is obviously a pb with scores, why would #8 score less than 9 or 7 ?

I have for sale 2 kits of 2 x 1 Gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2. First kit is Ballistix Classic with orange heatspreaders. Second kit is Ballistix Tracer with LED Both do 620 5-5-5-5 trfc30 at 2.30 V, tested ok on SPI32M on EP45-UD3P with E8500 and ram coefficient x3.0 vs FSB, XP SP3 and maxmem = 550 Mb. Failed test at 625, did not test in between. Some say max voltage can be much higher if you need more o/c room. I suspect D9GMH chips given the 5-5-5-5 series and nice o/c. Asked price is 20 eur per kit Shipping to Europe

hey oh here i suppose the points for ranks #2 to 6 are not correct ? http://hwbot.org/benchmar k/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=0&cores=1#start=0#interval=20 same goes with hw points? http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_2958&cores=1#start=0#interval=20

350shipped worldwide so shipping included....?

u r alive dude

it is getting better for globals for #1 at 0.61 and #7 to 11 at 0.59 getting the same amount of points, but not for 0.60 fps ranks #2-5 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/hwbot_x265_benchmark_-_4k/rankings?start=0&cores=1#start=0#interval=20

also looks like spi1M is for me tomorrow with 546ish fsb I should get below 11.500 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1692&cores=4#start=0#interval=20

on the q9400, looks like I hit the wall at 561.7 ... life could be worse http://hwbot.org/submission/3818943_bolc_cpu_frequency_core_2_quad_q9400_4493.62_mhz

is 2.2 now mandatory ?

I just benched a q9400 slb6b coeff x8 and had no trouble with the aio for similar voltages, so there was nothing to worry with the q8200 coeff x7 http://hwbot.org/submission/3817911_bolc_superpi___32m_core_2_quad_q9400_10min_54sec_78ms and now I am quite sure I should be able to take #2 rank with this board for max frequency, if the cpu does not wall... http://hwbot.org/benchmark/cpu_frequency/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1692&cores=4#start=0#interval=20

http://hwbot.org/submission/3818758_bolc_pifast_core_2_quad_q8200_25sec_280ms it is really good man, I used my 2nd best or what I thought was my 2nd best ep45 ud3p to bench it on a 240mm AIO, went from 1.64 to 1.70 V, and the cpu went all the way to 565 max fsb... which is pretty much the max fsb of my best ud3p on quads, so far. ok I pushed further vtt and nb to get there on this board, but it may surely do close to 570 on the other board /and/or on cold if I didn t hit the chip fsb wall. it gave me some practice at least and some fun, I was happy to best scannick

umounted it and read q8200, hence my first guess, but the code name is SL9GT... so Q8200S... will have to move everything to this category. The scores were amazing though...

damned I didn t see that. I will take a picture of the cpu to make sure when my spi32m run is over. I would be pissed if that is the case...

hw points seem ok, although sometimes the whole set of subs of a given bench / cpu go away and come back. but in my case, all my hwpoints seem fine. the global are fine too since I recalculated them to make sure I did not have "fake" points, which helped or it did adjust itself but all is fine except the x265 4k global on g470. however, for many users, the globals are artificially high, hence as is the ranking. but they will come down soon here. I like my 1200 hwpts and expect about 250 global, so I should be in the top 10 for sure, maybe 7-8ish Ps: check the rounding and exxact value on your 0.61 note, in fact it is 0.6066 fps. to get to 0.6151 to get a 0.62 is a long way... and if x265 2.2.0 becomes mandatory, no more easy rounding x265 2.2.0 now calculates 3 digits after the point (thanks to me complaining...? :D) https://hwbot.org/submission/3803493_bolc_hwbot_x265_benchmark___1080p_core_i7_7700k_45.273_fps in that example, I am not sure if they truncate or round : 45.273 becomes 45.27, but what would happen to 45.276, rounding to 45.28 or truncating ti 45.27...? so 0.608 may become 0.61 but might still be ranked after yours since you submitted first. since I am sure they will not manually check any 2.1.0 and older subs to get out the 3 digits number, but how the 3 digits will come out is still a mystery. they will round probably, but hopefully will use the 3 digits to establish ranking

You got me upset :D

entre mes mains, un core2quad 465 nm c est 540 minimum en max frequence :o :D

still the best :D globals are gone again... :o

Hi mat I tend to have consistent and no bug so far on 3.1 but on 3.1.1 and 3.2 I also do. This is a vague statement of course... on 3.2 my biggest issue is that the checksum for saving the file is given as bad, while no pb at all on 3.1. on 3.1.1 i get some crashes on hwinfo loading. apart form that, this gpupi is a lovely tool keep it up. and thank you !

sweet handling of ddr3 on the ep45t extreme !

gg ;)

Hello, Any updates regarding global points which can be completely wrong? Thanks for the hard work ++

and these are my 4th best cas4 kit... full timings are similar to those of vukashin but not exactly the same https://d1ebmxcfh8bf9c.cloudfront.net/u21439/image_id_200681.png

not very high, 2.3 V here but they do 560 cas4 à 2.28 V so 2.3 V is for some safety

do you mean rev 7 recalc went through but was incomplete, and a whole recalculation had to be done again? hopefully the system is smart, when recal is pushed by a user many times it only does it once ... PS: i am still jealous for the 3470 how many did you bin? I need to test this M5E check if it beats my M5F...