TaPaKaH

how did you manage to set BCLK to 235.3? no clock generator in setfsb works (at least here) and BIOS 235 = 235.0 under OS

singlechannel for ultimate performance?

it's old ... back then people used external links for verificational purposes, which, I reckon, got all wiped out when hwbot engine has updated hence you don't see anything

1.58 on lynnfield and PWM didn't explode ? I almost crapped my pants when my H55N started making squeeky sounds when I put 1.4V on it and ran 32M

yea, you need to be a Kama Sutra expert to mount TRUE with two tall-ish mem modules on this board

there is no SB container, it's useless go subzero on P55/H55 SB as it will coldbug. CPU running at -135 to -145 (CBB mod from first couple of pages) as for OS - always have two. One for stability testing (crashes a lot), second for actual runs (trying to avoid crashes on that one)

Initially, I was planning to run 5-6-5 but that didn't work out well, so had to settle for 6-6-5

and PCB code?

hello, batch ?

singlechannel ain't helping your score much

not a bug report, a feature request would be nice if one could delete pictures when updating a score

http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_2_e4300_1.8ghz there was a guy who submitted two cheated scores: 1M - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1037670_ 32M - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1037940_ I asked Massman and both were removed (hence you can't see the guy if you browse 2D ranks) but my and others' scores haven't recovered points back my 1M shows and is rewarded as 3rd (even though it's 2nd), my 32M shows and is rewarded as 2nd (even though it's 1st) EDIT: 1M is fixed, 32M left to fix

judging by this pic (http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/2442/dsc0051d.jpg) there was indeed some sauna action

even though I got 6.6, this board has some serious problems - after I got the 6.6 screenie, I tried 32M stability first (with low mems and qpi) - 233x27 was a crash at loop 15, 230x27 was a crash at loop 19, even 223x27 (6.0ghz) was a crash at loop 20 - 32M efficency with Clarkdale is worse than similar model, H55M-UD2H (32M at 4GHz is about 7 seconds slower) - there is no SetFSB support for this board, so you have to clock it like a Phenom - boot with desired BCLK/MEM and then change CPU multi via CPU Tweaker - takes VERY long to POST (22-24 seconds to bootscreen after you save settings in BIOS), makes it very hard to debug - (same as other H55 board) only 3 subtimings can be adjusted via BIOS on Clarkdale, rest you put "1" or "255" - no difference at all - Vcore settings closer to the top end do not work properly - Cannot recover in 1 step (loading profile , F10, Enter) after a BIOS crash - does not work properly with my OS (install / reboot problems)

all is correct in bencnmarks which are ranked upon number of cores/GPUs you can have multiple submissions worthy of global pts. BUT, only the submission with most global pts counts towards your personal total, but all submissions count towards team total.

even if it's miniITX - your cat will still find a way to sleep in the box

if it didn't scale above 1.75 then you'll never hit 7ghz .. some prescotts are just like that, scale nicely up to 1.7, but not higher

you've missed a number in the batch PCB code would be nice too

what's the batch ?

even if you run crazy mem/qpi/tweaks with the clarkdale, it still won't run much faster than 9:20, so don't waste your time unless you got a lynnfield

don't touch my golden cups

good luck fitting a rampot onto this board here UD7 retails for ~$450 (wholesale price <$400 with VAT), H55N around $135 ... no 6:1 here

properly made waza is very important for last loops (20-24), if you manage to get the available and sys.cache equal or very close (diff <100) with both being high, you can drop a good second or two there

uploaded P4-506 CPU-Z entry, attached picture of the CPU to the result then submitted other P4-506 scores (pi/wprime) and it still kept attaching the CPU picture to the score even though I didn't select to upload any additional pictures (all four slots were empty) example: 1,2,3,4,5 then, I started uploading P4-530 scores, but it still kept attaching the picture of P4-506 even though I didn't select any additionl picture to upload (all four picture slots were empty) example: 1,2,3,4,5 please check the picture uploading code, and, if possible, delete P4-506 cpu picture from my P4-530 scores

235 BCLK on Lynnfield will be tough, you'll have to use subzero for lowclock runsas for mems, I'm planning on 940 @ 5-6-5